DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Stolen hard drive could affect 582 Ohioans enrolled in United Healthcare Medicare plans – but they’re just finding out more than 3 months later

Posted on October 12, 2011 by Dissent

Tim Tresslar reports:

United Healthcare said Tuesday a hard drive containing information on 582 Ohioans who are members of its Medicare plans has been stolen from a vendor.The Minnetonka, Minn.-based company said it is notifying the affected members by mail. United HealthCare’s commercial health plans are not affected.

The hard drive belonged to Futurity First Insurance Group, a provider of sales and marketing services for the United Healthcare Medicare Advantage, Medicare Part D prescription drug, Evercare and Medicare Supplement plans, a news release states.

Futurity First sent the hard drive to a vendor for repair and it was stolen on or about June 28. The vendor told Futurity about the theft on Aug. 12.

Nearly a month later, on Sept. 14, Futurity told United Healthcare about the stolen hard drive.

The drive included member names, Social Security numbers and, in some cases, the birth dates and private health information, United Healthcare said.

The insurer said it is offering affected members one year with Debix, an identity protection service, for free.

Source: Dayton Daily News

Okay, those delays are too long. The unnamed vendor didn’t report the theft for a month and a half? And then Futurity didn’t report it to UHC for another month? That it took UHC a month to disclose the breach neither surprises nor upsets me, as I don’t think one month is unreasonable, even though some states have much stricter requirements. But the totality of the situation – that personal data that could be used for ID theft were stolen on June 28 and individuals have not yet received notification/warning three and a half months later – that is too much.

What makes this is even more aggravating, in my opinion, is that this drive was not storing information used for treatment – it was for marketing/sales purposes. While marketing is an accepted business operation, that personal data were put at risk for marketing seems a poor data protection decision. Does a company really need Social Security numbers to market?  Why couldn’t other types of IDs been created or used?

And how was the drive stolen from the vendor? Was it left in an employee’s car? Was there a burglary at the repair firm? Did Futurity have a contract with this vendor that required certain security protections – and if so, were those protections implemented?

Business associates are a major source of data security risk in the healthcare sector. I hope that HHS investigates this breach.

Related posts:

  • Stolen hard drive could affect 582 Ohioans enrolled in United Healthcare Medicare plans – but they're just finding out more than 3 months later
  • CMS Responding to Data Breach at Subcontractor
  • Seven Charged in North Texas as Part of Largest National Medicare Fraud Takedown in History
  • CMS Notifies Additional Individuals Potentially Impacted by MOVEit Data Breach
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHealth DataSubcontractorTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← Sony attacked again – 93,000 usernames and passwords compromised
Hacker attacks against retailers up 43 percent →

1 thought on “Stolen hard drive could affect 582 Ohioans enrolled in United Healthcare Medicare plans – but they’re just finding out more than 3 months later”

  1. JJ says:
    October 12, 2011 at 10:23 am

    UnitedHealthcare is pushed by AARP: https://www.aarpmedicareplans.com/landing/medicare-part-d.html

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit
  • British national “IntelBroker” charged with causing $25 million in damages; U.S. seeks his extradition from France
  • France issues press statement about arrest of ShinyHunters members
  • Patients Allege Home Delivery Pharmacy Failed to Timely Notify Them of Data Breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions
  • NY Attorney General James Affirms Hospitals Must Provide Access to Emergency Abortion Care
  • How Internet of Things devices affect your privacy – even when they’re not yours

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.