DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Preliminary analysis of Stratfor data dump (updated)

Posted on December 27, 2011 by Dissent

Identity Finder has analyzed some of the data released from the Stratfor hack:

  • 50,277 unique credit card numbers, of which 9,651 are not expired
  • 86,594 email addresses, of which 47,680 are unique
  • 27,537 phone numbers, of which 25,680 are unique
  • 44,188 encrypted passwords, of which roughly 50 percent could be easily cracked
    • 73.7 percent of decrypted passwords were weak
    • 21.7 percent of decrypted passwords were medium strength
    • 4.6 percent of decrypted passwords were strong
    • Average decrypted password length: 7.1 characters
    • 10 percent of decrypted passwords were less than 5 characters long
    • Only 4.8 percent of decrypted passwords were 10+ characters long
    • Presumably the remaining non-decrypted passwords were stronger than the decrypted subset
  • 13,973 of the addresses belonged to United States victims; the remainder belonged to individuals from around the world

Read more on Identity Finder.

So they were storing approximately 40,000 credit card numbers in clear text that were expired?  This is really inexcusable. If the numbers could not be charged, why retain them – and their CVV?

Updated 1-4-12:  Their updated analysis was released on Dec. 30.  One big difference is that the updated figures show over 36,000 unexpired credit card numbers:

  • 68,063 Unique Credit Card Numbers, of which approximately 36,000 have unexpired expiration dates. Note: Credit cards with expired expiration dates might still be valid, if they have since been renewed.
  • 859,311 Unique Email addresses.
  • 50,569 Phone Numbers.
  • 860,160 Hashed Passwords, of which roughly 11.8% could be easily cracked.
  • Average password length: 7.2 Characters.
  • 50,618 of the addresses belonged to United States victims; the remainder belonged to individuals from other parts of the world.

Thanks to the reader who made me aware of the update.

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← California Amendment Mandates A.G. Notification For Major Data Breaches
LulzXmas Donations by @DestructiveSec →

4 thoughts on “Preliminary analysis of Stratfor data dump (updated)”

  1. Chris L says:
    December 30, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    Where did you see that the CVVs were also retained?

    1. admin says:
      December 30, 2011 at 3:11 pm

      They announced that immediately. See my post at http://www.databreaches.net/?p=22426 that incorporates one of their tweets. But also, all you need to do is look at the data dumps they’ve been posting this past week and you’ll see the CVV’s.

      1. Chris L says:
        December 30, 2011 at 4:37 pm

        Oh, awesome. Somebody failed PCI 101.

        1. admin says:
          December 30, 2011 at 4:39 pm

          101, 102, 103, ……

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Turkish Group Hacks Zero-Day Flaw to Spy on Kurdish Forces
  • Cyberattacks on Long Island Schools Highlight Growing Threat
  • Dior faces scrutiny, fine in Korea for insufficient data breach reporting; data of wealthy clients in China, South Korea stolen
  • Administrator Of Online Criminal Marketplace Extradited From Kosovo To The United States
  • Twilio denies breach following leak of alleged Steam 2FA codes
  • Personal information exposed by Australian Human Rights Commission data breach
  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.