DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Why Data Security Regulation is Bad

Posted on February 13, 2012 by Dissent

Danny Lieberman comments:

The first government knee-jerk reaction in the face of a data breach is to create more government privacy compliance regulation.

This is analogous to shooting yourself in the foot while you hold the loaded weapon in one hand and apply band-aids with the other.

Democracies like Israel, the US and the UK have “a tendency to extremism tempered by having to compromise” (courtesy of D.M. Thomas in his NY Times book review of Philip Roth’s “Operation Shylock“.)

Read more on Infosec Island.

Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← Update: Texas pays for data breach
Firms prosecuted over welfare data →

1 thought on “Why Data Security Regulation is Bad”

  1. Info A$$urance says:
    February 13, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    Knee-jerk? This stuff has been happening since – mid 1980’s. Things need to be updated. The courts are fighting to get convictions when a big case is in front of them. This book smells of an overcooked propaganda sales effort. Trying to “rise” the stench higher to drive sales.

    I am “sure” the guy would say the same thing about a terrorist attack that worked thru a security flaw. The governments would work in concert to ensure the effective communications within the intelligence communities. I honestly think the next big “attack” could easily be come from the infrastructure……

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.