DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Reidentification Theory Doesn't Save Privacy Lawsuit–Steinberg v. CVS Caremark

Posted on February 28, 2012 by Dissent

Here’s an update on a lawsuit I noted back in March 2011.  Eric Goldman writes:

CVS Caremark provided consumer data to pharma companies and data brokers. The plaintiffs alleged that the data transfers violated CVS’s privacy policies, but CVS apparently disclosed only “de-identified” data as contemplated by HIPAA. Plaintiffs couldn’t sue under HIPAA, both because CVS complied with HIPAA and because HIPAA doesn’t enable a private cause of action for these violations. Although these facts implicate Sorrell v. IMS, that case didn’t come up because the plaintiffs didn’t sue under an analogous statute specifically pharmaceutical data transfers.

Instead, the plaintiffs sued under Pennsylvania’s consumer protection act, claiming that CVS made material misrepresentations in its privacy policies about its data handling. The court dismisses the suit–with prejudice!–on two principal grounds.

Read more on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.


Related:

  • It's been a strange week, Part 2. An open letter to Twitter.
  • Fraudster's fake data breach claims should remind media to be careful what we report
  • FTC Charges Data Broker with Facilitating the Theft of Millions of Dollars from Consumers' Accounts
  • US Government Intervenes In False Claims Lawsuit Against United States Investigations Services For Failing To Perform Required Quality Reviews Of Background Investigations
  • The "reincarnation" of BreachForums: A cyberdrama in three acts
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← 150+ More Sites and Servers hacked and defaced by Hax.r00t
Bank Of Israel Hacked by Mauritania Hacker team →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • 45,000 malicious IP addresses taken down in international cyber operation
  • The Broken Records: tracing the human cost of the 2022 British MoD leak
  • Telus Digital confirms breach after ShinyHunters claims 1 petabyte data theft
  • China’s CERT warns OpenClaw can inflict nasty wounds
  • Bell Ambulance data breach impacted over 238,000 people
  • Lotte Card fined 9.6 billion won for leaking users’ social registration numbers
  • Handala claims responsibility for attack on medical device maker Stryker
  • Police Scotland fined £66k for extracting and sharing mobile phone data
  • The rise of teen hackers ‘makes for a good headline’, but cyber crime activities peak later in life
  • Viral ‘Quittr’ Porn Addiction App Exposed the Masturbation Habits of Hundreds of Thousands of Users

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • New data shows increase in FBI searches of Americans’ data last year
  • CalPrivacy Fines PlayOn Sports $1.1 Million for CCPA Violations Involving Student Privacy
  • 17 States Sues Trump Administration Over Unlawful Data Demands Targeting Colleges
  • Privacy watchdogs sound alarm over US bid to get travellers’ social media
  • Petition filed over misuse of protesters’ data by Kenyan government and telcos

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: Dissent.73

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.