DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Bank vs. Customer Claims Rejected

Posted on August 29, 2012 by Dissent

Tracy Kitten reports:

Labeling it “a very close call,” a U.S. district court has rejected a Mississippi bank’s efforts to have a former commercial customer held liable for losses, damages and legal costs in an ACH and wire fraud case. And one legal expert suggests the case could set a precedent for other similar fraud cases.

Five months ago, BancorpSouth filed a countersuit against Choice Escrow and Land Title LLC, claiming that company, not the bank, was responsible for a fraudulent wire transfer that in 2010 drained more than $400,000 from Choice’s commercial account. The $14.3 billion bank argued that Missouri-based Choice was responsible for covering the bank’s financial losses and legal expenses related to the case

Read more on BankInfoSecurity.


Related:

  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • How many courts have had sealed and sensitive files exposed by one vendor's error?
  • Ukrainian Conti Ransomware Suspect Extradited to US from Ireland
  • Snowflake Loses Two More Bids to Dismiss Data Breach Plaintiffs
  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
Category: Breach IncidentsFinancial SectorOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Assange supporters claim to hack Cambridge University
50 busted in Shanghai for stealing and selling personal info (updated) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • NCCIA arrests man over massive data breach involving millions of Pakistanis
  • Defense Contractors Are Silencing Their Cybersecurity Watchdogs
  • Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Standing in Data Breach Class Actions
  • ALT5 Sigma sues former consultant over alleged data breach
  • Is your cyberinsurance paid up? Are you sure?
  • Everest Group Interview on Collins Aerospace Breach — Daily Dark Web
  • Breaking Up With Edtech Is Hard to Do
  • Benworth Capital Partners negotiated with threat actors after more than 25,000 lenders had data stolen
  • Android Hit by 0-Click RCE Vulnerability in Core System Component
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Illuminate Education For Failing to Protect Students’ Data

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal
  • DHS offers “disturbing new excuses” to seize kids’ biometric data, expert says
  • California Adds Injunctive Relief to its Right of Publicity Statute and Extends Liability to Digital Replicas

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.