DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Activision Can’t Push Data Breach Suit Into Arbitration

Posted on April 5, 2013 by Dissent

Law360 reports:

A California federal judge on Wednesday denied a bid by Activision Blizzard Inc. to force a putative class action over its data security protection into arbitration, rejecting the video game maker’s interpretation of an invasion of privacy exclusion in its arbitration agreement.

Read more on Law360.com (subscription required). The case is Benjamin Bell et al v. Blizzard Entertainment Inc et al, 2:12-cv-09475.

No related posts.

Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Uriminzokkiri Breach Update, 9001 Accounts leaked and Message Released for #OpNorthKorea
Glens Falls Hospital alerts patients of possible information breach →

2 thoughts on “Activision Can’t Push Data Breach Suit Into Arbitration”

  1. IA ENG says:
    April 5, 2013 at 10:13 am

    Alittle more information may be avilable here:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/112836567/Benjamin-Bell-et-al-v-Blizzard-Entertainment-Inc-et-al

    1. admin says:
      April 5, 2013 at 10:27 am

      That’s the original complaint, but thanks. If you see the judge’s ruling denying arbitration, please let us know.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Air Force Employee Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Disclose Unlawfully Classified National Defense Information
  • UK police arrest four in connection with M&S, Co-op and Harrods cyberattacks (1)
  • At U.S. request, France jails Russian basketball player Daniil Kasatkin on suspicion of ransomware conspiracy
  • Avantic Medical Lab hacked; patient data leaked by Everest Group
  • Integrated Oncology Network victim of phishing attack; multiple locations affected (2)
  • HHS’ Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule Investigation with Deer Oaks Behavioral Health for $225k and a Corrective Action Plan
  • HB1127 Explained: North Dakota’s New InfoSec Requirements for Financial Corporations
  • Credit reports among personal data of 190,000 breached, put for sale on Dark Web; IT vendor fined
  • Five youths arrested on suspicion of phishing
  • Russia Jailed Hacker Who Worked for Ukrainian Intelligence to Launch Cyberattacks on Critical Infrastructure

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act
  • Department of Justice Subpoenas Doctors and Clinics Involved in Performing Transgender Medical Procedures on Children
  • Google Settles Privacy Class Action Over Period Tracking App
  • ICE Is Searching a Massive Insurance and Medical Bill Database to Find Deportation Targets
  • Franklin, Tennessee Resident Sentenced to 30 Months in Federal Prison on Multiple Cyber Stalking Charges
  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.