DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Glens Falls Hospital alerts patients of possible information breach

Posted on April 5, 2013 by Dissent

Jon Alexander reports:

The medical records of more than 2,300 Glens Falls Hospital patients were stored for more than four months on an unprotected computer server, and the hospital’s investigation into whether the sensitive information was illicitly accessed is ongoing.

The hospital announced Thursday that a forensic audit determined that an outside records contractor, Portal Healthcare Solutions LLC, stored thousands of notes from doctors on an unprotected server between early November and mid-March, according to Glens Falls Hospital spokeswoman Darlene Raynsford.

Read more on PostStar.com. I do not see any notice on the hospital’s web site at the time of this posting.

Part of the hospital’s statement, as reported by the Post-Star, is disputed by the CEO of PORTAL | ASCEND GROUP.

In a statement to PHIprivacy.net,  the firm’s CEO, A. K. Jay Jaiswal, acknowledged that through human error, a secure server’s firewall settings left it open to unrestricted access. That problem only existed from March 5 – March 14, however, he says.  As soon as Portal was notified of the problem, the problem was corrected, and access logs were provided to the hospital for their forensic experts to examine. Both the hospital and Portal agree that the examination has revealed no access to the files and no downloads.  “Not a single document was showing a third party access,” Jaiswal stated in his e-mailed statement to PHIprivacy.net.

The server was a dedicated server and A. K. Jay Jaiswal informs PHIprivacy.net that no other clients experienced similar problems:

“We conducted security and penetration testing of all our data centers on March 14 and 15, 2013 ensuring all information was secured along with all of our systems,” he tells PHIprivacy.net, adding that this is the first incident of its kind Portal has experienced in 17 years.

We regret the incident and loss of client.

Contacted about the discrepancy between the hospital’s statement and Portal’s statement as to the exposure window, a hospital spokesperson stated that because there was an ongoing investigation, they would not be issuing any further statement or comment in response to Portal’s claims about time frame.

So… did Glens Falls really need to disclose this incident and notify patients? Under the old HITECH regulations, given the risk of harm threshold, they could have just kept quiet. And under the new regulations, which had not gone into effect as the time the vulnerability was detected, even though there’s a presumption that a breach is reportable, if their forensic examination showed no access or download, could they have decided to not notify? Is the hospital possibly alarming patients without cause, or are they engaging in admirable transparency and an abundance of caution?

Related posts:

  • Glens Falls Hospital and business associate sued over patient records exposure breach
  • TeamGhostShell posts “master list” of 548 leaks (so far)
  • Kaiser Permanente lawsuit against former business associate dismissed, but are patient data still at risk?
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Activision Can’t Push Data Breach Suit Into Arbitration
Pointer: A consolidated view on data breaches in 2012 →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.