DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Verizon releases it 2013 Data Breach Investigations Report

Posted on April 23, 2013 by Dissent

Verizon has released  the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR).  You can download the Executive Summary here and the full report here.

The DBIR analyzes data from 19 organizations — covering more than 47,000 reported security incidents and 621 confirmed data breaches from the past year. Because VZ has the cooperation of so many organizations, it provides a unique opportunity to analyze data. Although we do not know what percent of the incidents in their analyses overlap with the more than 1200 incidents compiled by DataLossDB.org for 2012, I find it fascinating to look at where the two organizations’ reports agree, and they do agree on numerous key findings – including the fact that most incidents involve external agents, not insiders, that over half of incidents involve hacking, and that breaches from the healthcare sector, while garnering much media attention, account for only about 1% of breaches. Their report is also consistent with RBS/OSF’s report indicating that most incidents do not involve particularly sophisticated attacks and most could be easily prevented. Verizon’s report, however, gives us a first harder look at state-sponsored attacks and other factors that RBS/OSF’s report does not address, such as their finding that approximately two-thirds of confirmed breaches involved data at rest or data being processed – and not data in transit. Worryingly, the majority of breaches take months to detect (and the problem got worse in 2013 compared to their 2012 data), and most breaches are not detected by the entity’s IT personnel.

So… how many times do we have to tell people to purge data that’s no longer really needed and to monitor to ensure that if you have policies in place to protect data on mobile devices, those policies are being implemented? DBIR notes – and most of us would agree, I think – that there is no one-size fits all in terms of protecting assets. Knowing the risks for your industry and type of data is critical.

Read their report for more details, and kudos to them for another fine report.


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← What healthcare CIOs need to know from Verizon data breach report
UK: Personal data breach by police to G4S →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.