DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Amendment to PA data breach notification statute passes, requires notification within 7 days of discovery

Posted on May 1, 2013 by Dissent

By a vote of 49-0, the Pennsylvania Senate passed Senate Bill 114, amending the state’s data breach notification law.

Section 1. Section 3 of the act of December 22, 2005 (P.L.474, No.94), known as the Breach of Personal Information Notification Act, is amended by adding subsections to read:

Section 3. Notification of breach.
(a.1) Notification by State agency.–If a State agency is the subject of a breach of security of the system, the State agency shall provide notice of the breach of security of the system required under subsection (a) within seven days following discovery of the breach. Notification shall be provided to the Office of Attorney General within three business days following discovery of the breach. A State agency under the Governor’s jurisdiction shall also provide notice of a breach of its security system to the Governor’s Office of Administration within three business days following the discovery of the breach. Notification shall occur regardless of the existence of procedures and policies under section 7.

(a.2) Notification by county, school district or municipality.–If a county, school district or municipality is the subject of a breach of security of the system, the county, school district or municipality shall provide notice of the breach of security of the system required under subsection (a) within seven days following discovery of the breach. Notification shall be provided to the district attorney in the county in which the breach occurred within three business days following discovery of the breach. Notification shall occur regardless of the existence of procedures and policies under section 7.

(A.3) STORAGE POLICY.–
(1) THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION SHALL DEVELOP A POLICY TO GOVERN THE PROPER STORAGE BY STATE AGENCIES OF DATA WHICH INCLUDES PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION. THE POLICY SHALL ADDRESS IDENTIFYING, COLLECTING, MAINTAINING, DISPLAYING AND TRANSFERRING PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION, USING PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION IN TEST ENVIRONMENTS, REMEDIATING PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION STORED ON LEGACY SYSTEMS AND OTHER RELEVANT ISSUES. A GOAL OF THE POLICY SHALL BE TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FUTURE BREACHES OF SECURITY OF THE SYSTEM.
(2) IN DEVELOPING THE POLICY UNDER PARAGRAPH (1), THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION SHALL CONSIDER SIMILAR EXISTING POLICIES IN OTHER STATES, BEST PRACTICES IDENTIFIED BY OTHER STATES AND RELEVANT STUDIES AND OTHER SOURCES AS APPROPRIATE. THE POLICY SHALL BE REVIEWED AT LEAST ANNUALLY AND UPDATED AS NECESSARY.

Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.

h/t, Law360.com

Category: Breach LawsOf Note

Post navigation

← Update: MN seeks dismissal of suits over DNR data breach
AU: Data breach notification bill revealed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters
  • Dutch police identify users on Cracked.io

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
  • AI tools collect and store data about you from all your devices – here’s how to be aware of what you’re revealing
  • 23andMe Privacy Ombudsman Urges User Consent Pre-Data Sale

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.