DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Amendment to PA data breach notification statute passes, requires notification within 7 days of discovery

Posted on May 1, 2013 by Dissent

By a vote of 49-0, the Pennsylvania Senate passed Senate Bill 114, amending the state’s data breach notification law.

Section 1. Section 3 of the act of December 22, 2005 (P.L.474, No.94), known as the Breach of Personal Information Notification Act, is amended by adding subsections to read:

Section 3. Notification of breach.
(a.1) Notification by State agency.–If a State agency is the subject of a breach of security of the system, the State agency shall provide notice of the breach of security of the system required under subsection (a) within seven days following discovery of the breach. Notification shall be provided to the Office of Attorney General within three business days following discovery of the breach. A State agency under the Governor’s jurisdiction shall also provide notice of a breach of its security system to the Governor’s Office of Administration within three business days following the discovery of the breach. Notification shall occur regardless of the existence of procedures and policies under section 7.

(a.2) Notification by county, school district or municipality.–If a county, school district or municipality is the subject of a breach of security of the system, the county, school district or municipality shall provide notice of the breach of security of the system required under subsection (a) within seven days following discovery of the breach. Notification shall be provided to the district attorney in the county in which the breach occurred within three business days following discovery of the breach. Notification shall occur regardless of the existence of procedures and policies under section 7.

(A.3) STORAGE POLICY.–
(1) THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION SHALL DEVELOP A POLICY TO GOVERN THE PROPER STORAGE BY STATE AGENCIES OF DATA WHICH INCLUDES PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION. THE POLICY SHALL ADDRESS IDENTIFYING, COLLECTING, MAINTAINING, DISPLAYING AND TRANSFERRING PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION, USING PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION IN TEST ENVIRONMENTS, REMEDIATING PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION STORED ON LEGACY SYSTEMS AND OTHER RELEVANT ISSUES. A GOAL OF THE POLICY SHALL BE TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FUTURE BREACHES OF SECURITY OF THE SYSTEM.
(2) IN DEVELOPING THE POLICY UNDER PARAGRAPH (1), THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION SHALL CONSIDER SIMILAR EXISTING POLICIES IN OTHER STATES, BEST PRACTICES IDENTIFIED BY OTHER STATES AND RELEVANT STUDIES AND OTHER SOURCES AS APPROPRIATE. THE POLICY SHALL BE REVIEWED AT LEAST ANNUALLY AND UPDATED AS NECESSARY.

Section 2. This act shall take effect in 60 days.

h/t, Law360.com


Related:

  • 'Trickery and f...ery': Agency under fire over senior manager's 'serious' privacy breach
  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • Cyberattack disables Onsolve Code Red emergency alert system across St. Louis region (1)
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
Category: Breach LawsOf Note

Post navigation

← Update: MN seeks dismissal of suits over DNR data breach
AU: Data breach notification bill revealed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ex-teen hackers warn parents are clueless as children steal ‘millions’
  • UK Government Considers Computer Misuse Act Revision
  • Japan issues arrest warrant against teen suspected of cyberattack using AI
  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)
  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS
  • KR: Privacy Commissioner’s Office Urges the Public to Beware of Fraudsters Exploiting the Tai Po Fire Disaster

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.