DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Data breach notification rules should only apply where individuals are ‘severely affected’, say EU Ministers

Posted on May 31, 2013 by Dissent

Out-Law.com reports:

Businesses should only have to report that they have experienced a personal data breach in cases where it is likely that individuals’ rights and freedoms have been “severely affected” by such a breach, EU Ministers have proposed.

The Working Party on Information Exchange and Data Protection (DAPIX), set up within the structure’s of the EU’s Council of Ministers, said, though, that there are circumstances in which data breaches likely to ‘severely affect’ individuals should not have to be reported.

Read more on Out-Law.com.

While I generally do not like risk of significant harm triggers, it’s interesting to note that in the EU, the harm would include significant humiliation or harm to reputation. Most U.S. data breach laws do not incorporate those as cognizable harms triggering reporting.


Related:

  • Revealed: Afghan data breach after MoD official left laptop open on train
  • Canada says hacktivists breached water and energy facilities
  • UK: FCA fines former employee of Virgin Media O2 for data protection breach
  • China Amends Cybersecurity Law and Incident Reporting Regime to Address AI and Infrastructure Risks
  • Alan Turing institute launches new mission to protect UK from cyber-attacks
  • Safaricom-Backed M-TIBA Victim of a Possible Data Breach Affecting Millions of Kenyans
Category: Breach LawsNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Lawsuits taking a different tack following healthcare data breaches
Oral surgeon notifies former patients after laptop with their PHI was stolen from his office (updated) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • NCCIA arrests man over massive data breach involving millions of Pakistanis
  • Defense Contractors Are Silencing Their Cybersecurity Watchdogs
  • Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Standing in Data Breach Class Actions
  • ALT5 Sigma sues former consultant over alleged data breach
  • Is your cyberinsurance paid up? Are you sure?
  • Everest Group Interview on Collins Aerospace Breach — Daily Dark Web
  • Breaking Up With Edtech Is Hard to Do
  • Benworth Capital Partners negotiated with threat actors after more than 25,000 lenders had data stolen
  • Android Hit by 0-Click RCE Vulnerability in Core System Component
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Illuminate Education For Failing to Protect Students’ Data

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.
  • Attorney General James and Multistate Coalition Secure $5.1 Million from Education Software Company for Failing to Protect Students’ Data       
  • EU Parliament committee votes to advance controversial Europol data sharing proposal
  • DHS offers “disturbing new excuses” to seize kids’ biometric data, expert says
  • California Adds Injunctive Relief to its Right of Publicity Statute and Extends Liability to Digital Replicas

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.