DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK: Islington Council hit with monetary penalty after 2,375 residents' personal details published online

Posted on August 23, 2013 by Dissent

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has served Islington Council with a monetary penalty of £70,000 after personal details of over 2,300 residents were released online.

The information was inadvertently released in response to a freedom of information request, and revealed sensitive personal information relating to residents’ housing needs, including details of whether they had a history of mental illness or had been a victim of domestic abuse.

The freedom of information request had been made through the What Do They Know (WDTK) website, which enables individuals to submit requests for information to public authorities. Responses are uploaded to the site and are available to all those wishing to view them.

The council released three spreadsheets on the 26 and 27 June that related to the work of the authorities’ Housing Performance Team. The council failed to spot that the documents contained the details of 2,375 residents who had either submitted applications for council housing, or were council tenants.

These details were published on the WDTK website, and remained available until the 14 July when an administrator working for the site identified the error and removed the information. The website reported the matter to the ICO two days later.

The ICO’s investigation found that the council had been alerted to the problem shortly after the first spreadsheet was published, but failed to correct the error. This resulted in the other two spreadsheets being released with the same problem.

ICO Head of Enforcement, Stephen Eckersley, said:

“This mistake not only placed sensitive personal information relating to residents at risk, but also the highlighted the lack of training and expertise within the council. Councils are trusted with sensitive personal information, and residents are right to expect it to be handled in a proper way. Unfortunately, in this case that did not happen, and Islington Council must now explain to residents how it will stop these mistakes being repeated.”

The breach occurred due to a lack of understanding of pivot tables. These are used in Microsoft Excel and other spreadsheet programs to neatly summarise large amounts of data. But the tables retain a copy of the source data used. This information is hidden from view, but is easily accessible.

Islington Council used the tables to show statistics on how housing had been allocated to residents, but failed to remove the source data, and so sensitive personal data about tenants was revealed.

The ICO’s Head of Policy, Steve Wood, recently published a blog explaining the problems caused when public authorities fail to recognise the information retained in pivot tables. The ICO is currently investigating a number of other authorities that have also made similar errors.

 SOURCE: Information Commissioner’s Office


Related:

  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (2)
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Pizza Hut Spain and Malta Data Analyst
IE: Abortion 'privacy breach' slammed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)
  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS
  • KR: Privacy Commissioner’s Office Urges the Public to Beware of Fraudsters Exploiting the Tai Po Fire Disaster
  • Cyber attack on Indian airports? Govt explains the scary threat that disrupted 400 flights last month.
  • How a noisy ransomware intrusion exposed a long-term espionage foothold
  • KR: Hacking scheme targeted 120,000 home cameras for sexual footage

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.