DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

When you try to confirm or disconfirm a claimed hack, Thursday edition

Posted on October 31, 2013 by Dissent

As regular readers know, I often try to confirm or disconfirm claimed hacks before just repeating what I see or read elsewhere. And I generally use a notification feature to let me know whether my requests have been delivered and/or read.

Here’s an example of why people may be frustrated or just say “screw it” instead of trying to give entities a chance to respond to claims online. From my e-mail today, complete with header and emphasis added by me:

Subject: Not read: Alleged hack of 1.1 million FB accounts
From: “Press (No-Reply)” <[email protected]> Date: Thu, October 31, 2013 19:06
To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>
Priority: High

Your message

To: Press (No-Reply)
Subject: Alleged hack of 1.1 million FB accounts
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 1:02:04 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)

was deleted without being read on Thursday, October 31, 2013 4:06:02 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Yes, I realize I’m not a New York Times reporter or some big gun, but really, Facebook, you should have read and replied to the inquiry.

Related posts:

  • Forbes Breach Email Statistics
  • 66 Chinese and Iranian based sites hacked and defaced by poltergeisth4cker
Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← Commentary: It's time for California and HHS to do a serious smackdown on "jokes" that invade privacy (update 1)
From the ICO today… →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.