DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Papen And Morales Call For Patient Information Security After Behavioral Health Audit

Posted on November 18, 2013 by Dissent

by Senator Howie C. Morales (D-Silver City) and Senate President Pro Tempore Mary Kay Papen (D-Las Cruces):

…. If state law provides greater privacy protection than federal law, state law controls.   New Mexico’s Children’s Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Act places limitations on the disclosure, without consent, of behavioral health information that could be used to identify a child under the age of 18 as the patient.   Further, information concerning a child who is receiving behavioral health services may not be released to “any other person, agency or governmental entity or placed in files or computerized data banks” accessible to persons who are not authorized to obtain this information.   In addition, under Section 32A-6A-24(H) NMSA 1978, this information cannot be “re-released” without express consent.   New Mexico’s Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code contains similar protections for adults.

In the federal court proceeding recently brought by eight of the 15 audited behavioral health providers, it appears that the HSD [Human Services Department] persuaded a federal court judge to allow it to:   scan and digitize all of the patient records held by the behavioral health providers whose payments have been suspended; obtain a list of consumers who have either received treatment for alcohol or drug use or who have a diagnosis code that indicates alcohol or drug use from OptumHealth; and send the list of names of these consumers to document-imaging companies hired by the HSD.   The stipulated order says that the HSD will transmit the list of names to the imaging companies “to ensure that the [patient] files are encrypted”.   The order says that the patient files will be taken off-site to a secure location and converted to an electronic format.   According to the order, it appears that the only information to be encrypted are the patient files of the consumers with drug or alcohol diagnoses.   This presumably leaves names of other behavioral health patients and their files unencrypted and readable to anyone, should a laptop computer be stolen or lost.

Senator Morales recently received word that several thousand names of behavioral health consumers with drug or alcohol diagnoses were emailed, without encryption, to several persons who should not have received them by an imaging company hired by the HSD.   The fact that this happened in the context of a federal lawsuit does not alter the medical privacy rights of patients under state or federal law.   Under federal law, the HSD is supposed to notify the persons whose names have been improperly disclosed.   If it has not already done so, we call upon the HSD to immediately:   1) notify the persons whose names have been improperly disclosed; 2) take steps to encrypt all behavioral health information (including patient names) that the HSD or any of its contractors handles; and 3) hire an independent auditor to verify that unencrypted behavioral health patient information has been cleared, purged or destroyed from all media and devices involved.

No related posts.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Georgia Department of Driver Services public computers expose personal information
CA: USPS investigating personal information breach in Menlo Park →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • India’s Max Financial says hacker accessed customer data from its insurance unit
  • Brazil’s central bank service provider hacked, $140M stolen
  • Iranian and Pro-Regime Cyberattacks Against Americans (2011-Present)
  • Nigerian National Pleads Guilty to International Fraud Scheme that Defrauded Elderly U.S. Victims
  • Nova Scotia Power Data Breach Exposed Information of 280,000 Customers
  • No need to hack when it’s leaking: Brandt Kettwick Defense edition
  • SK Telecom to be fined for late data breach report, ordered to waive cancellation fees, criminal investigation into them launched
  • Louis Vuitton Korea suffers cyberattack as customer data leaked
  • Hunters International to provide free decryptors for all victims as they shut down (2)
  • SEC and SolarWinds Seek Settlement in Securities Fraud Case

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t
  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.