DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

House Plans Vote On Security Requirements For Health Insurance Exchange

Posted on January 5, 2014 by Dissent

Kaiser Health News has a roundup of media coverage on the GOP’s intention to propose legislation requiring more security controls for HealthCare.gov. If you’re a supporter of Obamacare, you’ll likely see this as a move to undercut it.  But even if you’re a supporter of Obamacare, is there any merit to the proposal?

This may all be political gamesmanship as usual, but wouldn’t requiring breach notification to individuals in the event of a breach actually be a good thing?

And if Congress is willing to require enhanced security controls and breach notification for a site that doesn’t collect a heck of lot of personal information, how about requiring it for sites that do collect a lot of sensitive personal information?

Will we actually get a federal breach notification law out of this or will this be limited to healthcare.gov if it passes? I suspect we should keep a close eye on the bill to see if it’s something that might serve a broader purpose.  From Cantor’s statement, the Target data breach is also factoring into this. As Katherine Gasztonyi writes:

In the wake of the recent Target Corp. credit card data breach, Congress is once again turning its attention to data breach legislation. In a memorandum to Republican lawmakers on January 2, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) stated that he intends to schedule legislation on security and breach notification requirements for federally facilitated healthcare exchanges when Congress resumes session next week.  Democratic leaders characterized the news as yet another effort by Republican lawmakers to undermine the Affordable Care Act rather than a serious effort to deal with data security issues.

In his message to Congressional colleagues, Cantor discussed Target’s recent data breach, commenting that “millions of Americans learned [of Target’s data breach] from the press…” rather than from Target itself and stressing that “Americans shouldn’t have to wonder whether or not they will receive prompt notification” of a breach. Cantor went on to note that, while the Target breach “ha[d] received well-deserved attention”, another recent less-publicized report by Experian deserved scrutiny as well. The Experian report in question cautioned that, rather than the financial services industry, “[t]he healthcare industry, by far, will be the most susceptible to publicly disclosed and widely scrutinized data breaches in 2014.”

Read more on Inside Privacy.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesFederal

Post navigation

← Travel insurer Staysure warns 93,389 customers after card data hacked
Western Asian callers hack Bangalore IT firm phone lines, possible terror link considered →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.