DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

House Plans Vote On Security Requirements For Health Insurance Exchange

Posted on January 5, 2014 by Dissent

Kaiser Health News has a roundup of media coverage on the GOP’s intention to propose legislation requiring more security controls for HealthCare.gov. If you’re a supporter of Obamacare, you’ll likely see this as a move to undercut it.  But even if you’re a supporter of Obamacare, is there any merit to the proposal?

This may all be political gamesmanship as usual, but wouldn’t requiring breach notification to individuals in the event of a breach actually be a good thing?

And if Congress is willing to require enhanced security controls and breach notification for a site that doesn’t collect a heck of lot of personal information, how about requiring it for sites that do collect a lot of sensitive personal information?

Will we actually get a federal breach notification law out of this or will this be limited to healthcare.gov if it passes? I suspect we should keep a close eye on the bill to see if it’s something that might serve a broader purpose.  From Cantor’s statement, the Target data breach is also factoring into this. As Katherine Gasztonyi writes:

In the wake of the recent Target Corp. credit card data breach, Congress is once again turning its attention to data breach legislation. In a memorandum to Republican lawmakers on January 2, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) stated that he intends to schedule legislation on security and breach notification requirements for federally facilitated healthcare exchanges when Congress resumes session next week.  Democratic leaders characterized the news as yet another effort by Republican lawmakers to undermine the Affordable Care Act rather than a serious effort to deal with data security issues.

In his message to Congressional colleagues, Cantor discussed Target’s recent data breach, commenting that “millions of Americans learned [of Target’s data breach] from the press…” rather than from Target itself and stressing that “Americans shouldn’t have to wonder whether or not they will receive prompt notification” of a breach. Cantor went on to note that, while the Target breach “ha[d] received well-deserved attention”, another recent less-publicized report by Experian deserved scrutiny as well. The Experian report in question cautioned that, rather than the financial services industry, “[t]he healthcare industry, by far, will be the most susceptible to publicly disclosed and widely scrutinized data breaches in 2014.”

Read more on Inside Privacy.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesFederal

Post navigation

← Travel insurer Staysure warns 93,389 customers after card data hacked
Western Asian callers hack Bangalore IT firm phone lines, possible terror link considered →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • How the Signal Knockoff App TeleMessage Got Hacked in 20 Minutes
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Ex-NSA bad-guy hunter listened to Scattered Spider’s fake help-desk calls: ‘Those guys are good’
  • Former Sussex Police officer facing trial for rape charged with 18 further offences relating to computer misuse
  • Beach mansion, Benz and Bitcoin worth $4.5m seized from League of Legends hacker Shane Stephen Duffy
  • Fresno County fell victim to $1.6M phishing scam in 2020. One suspected has been arrested, another has been indicted.
  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy
  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.