DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Report of the Health Data Research Forum: Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner for B.C. and the B.C. Ministry of Health

Posted on February 17, 2014 by Dissent

From the report:

On December 9, 2013, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia (OIPC) and the B.C. Ministry of Health (MoH) convened a meeting of 38 representatives from the health research community and its stakeholders in British Columbia. The attendees were invited to come together to discuss and seek solutions on timely access to, and appropriate use of, health data under the stewardship of the MoH and health authorities for research, evaluation, planning and quality improvement while maintaining academic independence and enhancing privacy protections and security safeguards. Discussion included, but was not limited to:

  • The current state of health data access for research and health system innovation in B.C.;
  • Best practices for improving access to health data for research purposes;
  • Methods to ensure strong privacy protections and security safeguards; and
  • Principles for an improved future state with identified priority action items for continuous improvement.

Moreover, this forum built upon previous efforts to enhance timely and appropriate access to health data by identifying opportunities, barriers and solutions to health data access discussed in the OIPC’s Report of the Roundtable Discussion on Access to Data for Health Research – held on June 25, 2012 and the efforts of the MoH to implement recommendations following three recent health data breaches and the associated investigations. This report serves as the record of the discussions of the Health Data Research Forum held on December 9, 2013.

[…]

The key recommendations for the next 12 months to develop robust and enabling privacy and security frameworks include:

  • Reviewing the role of the Data Stewardship Committee (DSC);
  • Designing proportionate and tailored privacy and security framework;
  • Articulated and common principles within the GHISA and training for the principles and framework developed in the GHISA;
  • Standardized data request, review and approval process within health authorities;
  • Clearly identified roles and responsibilities for all parties involved;
  • Clarification on the “use for contact purposes” in the FIPPA S.35 (1)(a)(i);
  • Acceptable alternatives to encryption;
  • Workshops to review existing privacy and security frameworks and work towards a harmonized approach; and
  • Develop a library of Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs).

The key long-term recommendations to develop robust and enabling privacy and security frameworks include:

  • Mechanisms to keep the framework current;
  • Clear guidelines to researchers for safe storage of personal health and/or sensitive information;
  • Consistent standards for data linking regarding identification;
  • Data Stewardship Committee guidance on sensitivity of data;
  • Population Data BC to have access to HealthIdeas; and
  • Defined criteria for low-risk data regarding the potential identification of subjects.

You can download the full report here (pdf).

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← NHS admits new medical records database could pose privacy risk
Wachovia customer sues bank for failing to protect his account and then falsely fingering him to the feds →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Texas Doctor Who Falsely Diagnosed Patients as Part of Insurance Fraud Scheme Sentenced to 10 Years’ Imprisonment
  • VanHelsing ransomware builder leaked on hacking forum
  • Hack of Opexus Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
  • ‘Deep concern’ for domestic abuse survivors as cybercriminals expected to publish confidential abuse survivors’ addresses
  • Western intelligence agencies unite to expose Russian hacking campaign against logistics and tech firms
  • Disrupting Lumma Stealer: Microsoft leads global action against favored cybercrime tool
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • Privilege Under Fire: Protecting Forensic Reports in the Wake of a Data Breach
  • Hacker who breached communications app used by Trump aide stole data from across US government
  • Massachusetts hacker to plead guilty to PowerSchool data breach (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.