DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Cost of Target data breach exceeds $200M so far just for card replacement-related costs for 22M customers

Posted on February 18, 2014 by Dissent

From the Credit Union National Association:

 Financial institutions continue to respond to the massive data breach at Target. According to data collected by the Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) and the Credit Union National Association the costs associated with the Target data breech (sic) exceed $200 million.  CBA estimates the cost of card replacements for its members to have reached $172 million, up from an initial finding of $153 million, CUNA has stated the cost to credit unions has increased to $30.6 million from an original estimate of $25 million.

So far, cards replaced by CBA members and credit unions account for more than half of all affected cards. Between members of the Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) and the Credit Union National Association (CUNA), 21.8 million of the 40 million compromised cards have been replaced. This represents 54.5 percent of the cards Target has revealed to have been compromised due to the December data breach.

“Financial institutions of all sizes have been aggressive in ensuring their customers are protected in response to the Target data breach. CBA’s members have proactively replaced cards, increased fraud monitoring efforts and have expanded call center hours. Consumers should rest assured, our members are taking every step to minimize the impact of this massive breach,” said Richard Hunt, president and CEO of the CBA.

“Credit unions have replaced or will replace 85% of their cards affected by the Target breach at no cost to their members,” said Bill Cheney, president and CEO of CUNA. “The combined $200 million cost borne entirely by banks and credit unions shows the extent to which financial institutions will go to protect their customers and members.”

The combined $200 million cost does not factor in costs to financial institutions other than credit unions or members of the CBA, nor does it take into account any fraudulent activity which may have occurred or may occur in the future. Fraudulent activity would push the cost of the Target data breach to the industry much higher, as consumers would not be held liable.

No related posts.

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackMalware

Post navigation

← Hackers Show They’ve Stolen 828 Gb of Data from Systems of Las Vegas Sands
WEDI publishes health data breach notification tips →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.