DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Target ignored its own warning system – Bloomberg (updated)

Posted on March 13, 2014 by Dissent

I’m watching  Josh Tyrangiel of Bloomberg on CBS News this morning reporting that prior to its massive breach, Target ignored the warning alerts generated by its  FireEye system.  Target hasn’t responded to Bloomberg’s questions as to why the warning e-mails generated by the system were ignored.

Interestingly, we heard something similar in the Neiman-Marcus breach where hackers kept triggering alarms, but the almost 60,000 alarms were ignored by personnel  who viewed them as false positives.

Update: Jim Finkle and Susan Heavey of Reuters have more on this and Target’s response, including comments by experts that it’s completely understandable that personnel might ignore the malware alerts from FireEye:

FireEye has a function that automatically deletes malicious software, but it had been turned off by Target’s security team before the hackers’ attack, the Bloomberg report said, citing two people who audited FireEye’s role after the breach.

Shook and Strand said that the vast majority of FireEye’s customers turn off that functionality because it is known for incorrectly flagging data as malware, which can halt email and Web traffic for business users.

“FireEye … is cutting edge,” Strand said. “But it takes love and care and feeding. You have to watch it and monitor it.”

Category: Business SectorHackID TheftOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← EC-Council notifies members of recent breach
TX: Resident Finds Unshredded Copies of Personal Documents in Apartment Dumpster →

6 thoughts on “Target ignored its own warning system – Bloomberg (updated)”

  1. Anonymous says:
    March 13, 2014 at 9:40 am

    Because too many alerts are “just noise”. FireEye alerts are noise because it is too hard to react to them.

  2. Anonymous says:
    March 13, 2014 at 9:42 am

    They are ignored because there isn’t a mechanism to react to them.

    The FireEye hangover is what you get after you’ve bought FireEye but cannot react to what it is telling you.

    People buy the product with no way to act upon the alerts. This is what FireEye neglects to tell you when you buy their product.

  3. Josh jones says:
    March 13, 2014 at 6:04 pm

    It would be interesting to hear someone from FireEye comment to that.

    1. Dissent says:
      March 13, 2014 at 6:23 pm

      Yeah, but what can they really say other than, “What do we need to do – dance naked on the table to get your attention?”

  4. Anonymous says:
    March 13, 2014 at 11:35 pm

    “Let your stolen data reach the sky.FireEye!”

  5. Anonymous says:
    March 14, 2014 at 2:34 pm

    Malware.binary overload. All FireEye customers know that feeling, $1.6m for a generic message whilst the founders become billionaires on a cash cow.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • ShinyHunters and team members arrested in France
  • Texas Enacts Liability Shield From Punitive Damages for Certain Small Businesses That Adopt Cybersecurity Programs
  • Dublin ETB fined €125,000 for data protection breaches
  • From $5,000 to $800,000: Days Apart, OCR Security Settlements Show Puzzling Math
  • Liberty Township in Ohio has recovered its network after a ransomware attack
  • Marquette County Medical Care Facility discloses data breach
  • Industry Letter – June 23, 2025: Impact to Financial Sector of Ongoing Global Conflicts
  • MNGI Digestive Health settles class action lawsuit stemming from BlackCat attack
  • Four REvil ransomware members released after time served on carding charges
  • Why Dumping Sensitive Data on Network Shares is a Liability

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How Internet of Things devices affect your privacy – even when they’re not yours
  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.