DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Current and former Weather Shield employees continue to battle identity theft

Posted on March 21, 2014 by Dissent

Just a quick update to the Weather Shield case – where employees have been victims of tax refund fraud for the past three years, although Weather Shield says there is no evidence that they had a breach: so far this year, there have been 24 cases of tax refund fraud.

And for the life of me, I don’t understand why the IRS hasn’t already issued everyone who on the payroll in 2010 and 2011 a PIN to protect themselves so that fraudulent returns aren’t processed. Why wait until these poor folks become victims of ID theft and then issue them a PIN for future returns when you can actually prevent the fraud by flagging their SSN now with a PIN?

Previous coverage of this breach on this blog can be found here, here, here, here, and here.


Related:

  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • Cyberattack disables Onsolve Code Red emergency alert system across St. Louis region (1)
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
Category: ID TheftOf Note

Post navigation

← GA: Dozens of Watershed Management Employees’ Identity Stolen for Tax Refund Fraud
Settlement of Lawsuit against Stanford Hospital & Clinics and Former Vendor Gets Tentative Approval →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.