DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

TX: Document Shredding Company Employee Eyed in ID Theft Ring

Posted on March 30, 2014 by Dissent

Scott Gordon reports:

A Fort Worth man who worked for a document shredding company did not destroy bank records and instead shared them with thieves, according to court documents.

The number of potential victims is in the thousands and the total loss may be in the millions of dollars, a law enforcement source told NBC DFW.

Patrick Doucet, 43, of Fort Worth, drove a truck for Cintas Document Management, police said.The Ohio-based company promotes its off-site shredding business as safe and secure.

Read more on NBCDFW.


Related:

  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Researchers claim 'largest leak ever' after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • Eurofiber admits crooks swiped data from French unit after cyberattack
  • French agency Pajemploi reports data breach affecting 1.2M people
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorID TheftInsiderPaperU.S.

Post navigation

← Claims that Trustwave was responsible for monitoring Target’s network “baseless” – Trustwave
Document Shredding Company Employee Eyed in ID Theft Ring →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.