DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

2005 called and they want their reassurances back

Posted on May 7, 2014 by Dissent

Am I the only one who actually feels embarrassed these days to read a breach notification  that tries to reassure those notified by emphasizing that the data were password protected?  Consider this excerpt from a breach notification written last month:

However, the information on the server is password protected. Accordingly, for any unauthorized person to gain access to any of the information contained on our server, they would first have to know and enter a confidential password for the computer system.

Our firm believes the equipment, which was stolen, was probably taken for the value of the hardware, rather than the information contained on it. Additionally, as set forth above, the information is password protected, and it is unlikely that unauthorized persons would be unable (sic) to break through the password security system in order to access confidential data.

From the notification letter sent by Green’s Accounting, concerning a burglary that resulted in theft of a server with unencrypted personal information.

What really scares me is the possibility they believe that a password is sufficient protection for Social Security numbers and bank account information.  Their letter does not indicate that they plan to start encrypting data. Nor does it mention, for that matter, what they intend to do about their physical security to prevent another burglary. If all it took was breaking a window with a rock, well, that doesn’t sound like great physical security was in place.

Category: Business SectorTheft

Post navigation

← OCR dismisses Walgreens ‘Well Experience’ HIPAA complaint
Boulder Community Health investigating patient records allegedly acquired from unlocked bins or dumpsters →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ex-NSA bad-guy hunter listened to Scattered Spider’s fake help-desk calls: ‘Those guys are good’
  • Former Sussex Police officer facing trial for rape charged with 18 further offences relating to computer misuse
  • Beach mansion, Benz and Bitcoin worth $4.5m seized from League of Legends hacker Shane Stephen Duffy
  • Fresno County fell victim to $1.6M phishing scam in 2020. One suspected has been arrested, another has been indicted.
  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.