DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

AT&T Mobility reports breach involving service provider employees

Posted on June 19, 2014 by Dissent

So apparently it’s not enough that I read and think about gadzillions of breach notification letters. I’m supposed to actually report on them, too, huh? It seems I was so underwhelmed by an AT&T Mobility breach that I never reported on it here,  even though mainstream media found it really newsworthy, with some even going so far as to suggest that AT&T brought the attack on themselves by its heavy-handed approach to unlocking phones.

To get you all caught up, since I’ve been nudged by a reader to do so: AT&T Mobility disclosed that three employees of an unnamed third-party service provider accessed some customer information during a two-week period in April.  The information included date of birth, Social Security and Customer Proprietary Network Information (which includes the type of information you’d find on your phone bill, like call records). 

The wrongdoers’ goal, AT&T says, was to request codes to unlock phones in the secondary mobile phone market so that those phones could be used with other telecoms.

Those affected were offered free credit monitoring for one year.

AT&T has been coy (translation: non-transparent) about disclosing how many customers were affected, or the name of the third-party provider. Nor have they explained why the third-party provider needed access to customer Social Security numbers.

So why didn’t I tell you about this at the time,  you ask? Well, it’s really nothing new. In 2012,  they disclosed that employees of an unnamed service provider had improperly accessed some customers’ accounts and misused the information. And I recently noted a 22-count indictment against 8 defendants for stealing AT&T customer data  and using the information to make unauthorized wire transfers from the victims’ bank accounts and obtain unauthorized credit or debit cards. One of the defendants was an employee of Interactive Response Technologies, lnc., who provides call center services for AT&T.

So what’s new here? Just that the goal was to unlock phones on the secondary market? Isn’t the real issue that employees of a service provider that they won’t name had access to your Social Security numbers and metadata that could reveal personal information or be misused for other purposes?  AT&T has a lot of service providers, I would imagine.  Who runs the criminal background checks on their employees? The service providers? AT&T?  What can – and will – AT&T do to prevent more of these types of breaches?  How protected are your SSN and why can’t we get Congress to outlaw the use of SSNs for commercial purposes?

 

 

No related posts.

Category: Breach IncidentsInsiderSubcontractor

Post navigation

← US Marshal CCs, rather than BCCs, those interested in anonymous Bitcoin auction
LinkedIn vulnerability to MITM attacks puts your data at risk – Zimperium →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.