DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

U.S. Bank ordered to pay $48 million in restitution to theft-protection customers

Posted on September 26, 2014 by Dissent

Martin Moylan reports:

Two federal regulatory agencies have fined U.S. Bank $9 million and ordered the company to pay $48 million in restitution to customers unfairly billed for identity theft protection.

The action affects more than 420,000 consumers who signed up for theft protection from 2003 to 2012. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau say those customers did not receive the full benefits of the products they purchased.

U.S. Bank was also ordered to improve its oversight of third-party vendors associated with “add-on” consumer products. A bank spokesman said the problem was primarily related to an outside firm offering identity theft protection.

Read more on MPR.


Related:

  • IRS’s Top 10 Identity Theft Prosecutions
  • IRS’s Top Ten Identity Theft Prosecutions
  • Ringleader of $24 Million Stolen Identity Tax Refund Fraud Ring Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison
  • Court Authorizes Service of John Doe Summons Seeking the Identities of U.S. Taxpayers Who Have Used Virtual Currency 
  • Experian ProtectMyID didn't protect him from ID theft - Target customer
Category: ID TheftUncategorized

Post navigation

← WA: Yakima County office computers no longer have virus
IN: Floyd Memorial installs fingerprint scanners →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Telus Digital confirms breach after ShinyHunters claims 1 petabyte data theft
  • China’s CERT warns OpenClaw can inflict nasty wounds
  • Bell Ambulance data breach impacted over 238,000 people
  • Lotte Card fined 9.6 billion won for leaking users’ social registration numbers
  • Handala claims responsibility for attack on medical device maker Stryker
  • Police Scotland fined £66k for extracting and sharing mobile phone data
  • The rise of teen hackers ‘makes for a good headline’, but cyber crime activities peak later in life
  • Viral ‘Quittr’ Porn Addiction App Exposed the Masturbation Habits of Hundreds of Thousands of Users
  • New Report Finds One in Two U.S. School Districts Experienced a Cybersecurity Incident in 2025
  • Foreign hacker in 2023 compromised Epstein files held by FBI, source and documents show

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Petition filed over misuse of protesters’ data by Kenyan government and telcos
  • When Miscarriage Is Recast As Murder
  • The Government Uses Targeted Advertising to Track Your Location. Here’s What We Need to Do.
  • Santa Ana homeowner says insurance company used drone to inspect her roof without telling her
  • Ring’s Jamie Siminoff is still trying to calm privacy fears, but his answers may not help

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: Dissent.73

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.