DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Seattle Public Schools fires law firm after their failure to redact exposed thousands of students’ records (Updated)

Posted on November 14, 2014 by Dissent

Heather Graf reports that Seattle Public Schools has notified parents of approximately 8,000 students of a breach involving their records. Most of the students involved are special education students.

According to King5 News, the notification states, in part:

“Late Tuesday night Seattle Public Schools learned that a law firm retained by the district to handle a complaint against the district inadvertently sent personally identifiable student information to an individual involved in the case. The district promptly removed the law firm from the case and is working to ensure that all improperly released records are retrieved or destroyed.”

The person to whom the records were mistakenly released contacted the district to report the breach.

You can read more on King5 News. There does not appear to be any notice up on the Seattle Public Schools web site at this time.

The district has reportedly notified the U.S. Education Department of the breach to seek their assistance in investigating how the breach happened. I’d be surprised if they got any real assistance of that kind, but I’d be happy to be wrong about that.

Most people know that students’ education records are protected under FERPA, but for special education students, another federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) also applies. IDEA has provisions requiring confidentiality of records. Unlike FERPA, however, IDEA is enforced by the state’s education agency, not the U.S. Education Department.

So what might the consequences of this breach be? The law firm who exposed the information got fired. That’s unusual, but I do think that needs to be headlined so that law firms get the message that their clients are serious about data protection. Other than that, I don’t really expect anything else. A complaint to USED under FERPA might result in an educative letter to the District without any other consequences, and a complaint to the state is unlikely to result in any consequences for the district.

Could the FTC initiate an investigation and/or enforcement action against the law firm? I cannot think of any data security cases involving law firms, can you?

In other words, this is likely to be just another day in the education sector.

Update: In subsequent coverage on The Seattle Times , the law firm was named as Preg O’Donnell & Gillett, a firm the district uses in specific cases. While they have been fired from this case, they have not been fired from all the cases they are handling, although that is now under review.  And a review definitely seems in order, as the man who received the unredacted documents

says in his letter that he brought the issue to the district’s attention a few weeks ago when he’d received a few documents with sensitive information, but nothing was done and the law firm then emailed a much larger batch.

If the District was notified weeks earlier of another problem like this and did nothing, then that’s on them as well as the law firm.

Related posts:

  • Kept in the Dark — Meet the Hired Guns Who Make Sure School Cyberattacks Stay Hidden
Category: Education SectorExposureSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← FTC asking Apple about health data protection – Sources
Citizens Bank Manager Sentenced to 30 Months in Prison for Identify Theft Scheme →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Russia Jailed Hacker Who Worked for Ukrainian Intelligence to Launch Cyberattacks on Critical Infrastructure
  • Kentfield Hospital victim of cyberattack by World Leaks, patient data involved
  • India’s Max Financial says hacker accessed customer data from its insurance unit
  • Brazil’s central bank service provider hacked, $140M stolen
  • Iranian and Pro-Regime Cyberattacks Against Americans (2011-Present)
  • Nigerian National Pleads Guilty to International Fraud Scheme that Defrauded Elderly U.S. Victims
  • Nova Scotia Power Data Breach Exposed Information of 280,000 Customers
  • No need to hack when it’s leaking: Brandt Kettwick Defense edition
  • SK Telecom to be fined for late data breach report, ordered to waive cancellation fees, criminal investigation into them launched
  • Louis Vuitton Korea suffers cyberattack as customer data leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.