DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Update to HHS breach tool provides insight to OCR's response to insider data theft

Posted on February 26, 2015 by Dissent

Back in April 2013, this site noted a breach involving Shands Jacksonville Medical Center.  The breach, which involved data theft for a tax refund fraud ring, had been reported to Shands by law enforcement in October 2012, and arrests were made in January 2013.  Over 14,000 patients were notified in April after a law enforcement stay on notification was lifted.

Because I recently questioned how OCR responds to insider data theft for tax refund fraud, I was interested to find their summary of how Shands and OCR responded to the breach:

A clinical intern at the covered entity (CE), University of Florida Health Jacksonville (UFHJ) (formerly Shands Jacksonville Medical Center), took photographs of protected health information (PHI) and emailed the PHI to an unauthorized third person for the purpose of filing fraudulent tax returns. The PHI included the names, addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth, and treatment information of 1,025 individuals. Law enforcement agencies that learned of the breach informed the CE and requested delays of breach notification. The CE later provided breach notification to affected individuals, HHS, and the media, and offered affected individuals one year of free identity theft protection. Following the breach, the CE sanctioned two workforce members who had allowed the intern, who was no longer at the CE, to use their credentials to access the electronic medical records in violation of its policies. The CE also retrained workforce members on its privacy policies; increased access restrictions to social security numbers; and ended its clinic-based internships. OCR provided technical assistance and obtained assurances of the CE’s plan to update its breach notification policies and procedures.

So.. what do you think? Was that a strong enough response on OCR’s part? Keeping in mind that Shands did not detect this breach on their own, should OCR’s response have included assurances of more auditing/monitoring of access?

 

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Ca: Police charge former bank employee
Hack Attack That Hit NYC Emails May Have Come from Russia: Sources →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news (Updated)
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.