DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Update to HHS breach tool provides insight to OCR's response to insider data theft

Posted on February 26, 2015 by Dissent

Back in April 2013, this site noted a breach involving Shands Jacksonville Medical Center.  The breach, which involved data theft for a tax refund fraud ring, had been reported to Shands by law enforcement in October 2012, and arrests were made in January 2013.  Over 14,000 patients were notified in April after a law enforcement stay on notification was lifted.

Because I recently questioned how OCR responds to insider data theft for tax refund fraud, I was interested to find their summary of how Shands and OCR responded to the breach:

A clinical intern at the covered entity (CE), University of Florida Health Jacksonville (UFHJ) (formerly Shands Jacksonville Medical Center), took photographs of protected health information (PHI) and emailed the PHI to an unauthorized third person for the purpose of filing fraudulent tax returns. The PHI included the names, addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth, and treatment information of 1,025 individuals. Law enforcement agencies that learned of the breach informed the CE and requested delays of breach notification. The CE later provided breach notification to affected individuals, HHS, and the media, and offered affected individuals one year of free identity theft protection. Following the breach, the CE sanctioned two workforce members who had allowed the intern, who was no longer at the CE, to use their credentials to access the electronic medical records in violation of its policies. The CE also retrained workforce members on its privacy policies; increased access restrictions to social security numbers; and ended its clinic-based internships. OCR provided technical assistance and obtained assurances of the CE’s plan to update its breach notification policies and procedures.

So.. what do you think? Was that a strong enough response on OCR’s part? Keeping in mind that Shands did not detect this breach on their own, should OCR’s response have included assurances of more auditing/monitoring of access?

 

No related posts.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Ca: Police charge former bank employee
Hack Attack That Hit NYC Emails May Have Come from Russia: Sources →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Integrated Oncology Network victim of phishing attack; multiple locations affected (2)
  • HHS’ Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule Investigation with Deer Oaks Behavioral Health for $225k and a Corrective Action Plan
  • HB1127 Explained: North Dakota’s New InfoSec Requirements for Financial Corporations
  • Credit reports among personal data of 190,000 breached, put for sale on Dark Web; IT vendor fined
  • Five youths arrested on suspicion of phishing
  • Russia Jailed Hacker Who Worked for Ukrainian Intelligence to Launch Cyberattacks on Critical Infrastructure
  • Kentfield Hospital victim of cyberattack by World Leaks, patient data involved
  • India’s Max Financial says hacker accessed customer data from its insurance unit
  • Brazil’s central bank service provider hacked, $140M stolen
  • Iranian and Pro-Regime Cyberattacks Against Americans (2011-Present)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.