DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Miami-Dade County Resident Sentenced In Stolen Identity Unemployment Insurance Fraud Scheme

Posted on March 12, 2015 by Dissent

A North Miami Beach resident was sentenced yesterday to 96 months imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release, for filing fraudulent unemployment insurance claims using the personal identifying information (PII) of more than 90 individuals.

According to court records, from at least as early as December 2013, through the summer of 2014, the unemployment insurance claims of more than 90 victims (utilizing the victims’ respective PII) were submitted online from the residence of Reginald Steele-Nelson, 28. In filing these claims, Steele-Nelson used the victims’ PII, including their names and social security numbers. A federal search warrant was obtained for Steele-Nelson’s residence and was executed on August 21, 2014. On that date, law enforcement officers discovered nearly two thousand pieces of unique PII inside the residence and on Steele-Nelson’s person. Law enforcement officers also located a credit card “skimmer,” a device specifically designed to assist in the creation of fraudulent credit and debit cards. Steele-Nelson filed fraudulent unemployment insurance claims with the states of Florida, New York, and Massachusetts. He also filed fraudulent Social Security claims and redirected legitimate Social Security claims from their intended recipients to accounts he controlled. The amount of the intended loss resulting from Steele-Nelson’s offense was nearly $900,000; when taken with the approximately $236,000 in funds actually paid out during the scheme, Steele-Nelson was held accountable for more than $1,100,000 in loss.

Steele-Nelson previously pled guilty to one count of use of one or more unauthorized access devices to obtain $1,000 in value or more during one calendar year, one count of possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, one count of possession of device making equipment, and three counts of aggravated identity theft. Restitution in the full amount of actual loss, $236,371.45, was ordered by U.S. District Judge Kathleen M. Williams.

SOURCE: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida


Related:

  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
Category: ID TheftSkimmersU.S.

Post navigation

← Fear of data breaches leads 21% of patients to withhold information from physicians
UK: Mass Surveillance: Intelligence Staff Sacked →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.