DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

California Department of Business Oversight accidentally disclosed personal information to public records requestors

Posted on April 2, 2015 by Dissent

California’s Department of Business Oversight is notifying some investment advisers and dealer-brokers that due to a redaction error on the department’s part, their Social Security numbers were sent to public records requestors.

The breach, which occurred on January 5, was not discovered until March 11, and the department does not indicate how it first became aware of it.

In a notification letter dated March 23, the department explains:

The California Public Records Act (PRA) requires the Department of Business Oversight (DBO) to provide the public copies of the non-confidential portions of our electronic licensing records upon request. To process these requests, DBO utilizes the records contained in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) Central Registration Depository (CRD). Fields clearly designated as containing personal identifying information within the FINRA CRD are then redacted by DBO prior to its release. However, despite our efforts, DBO recently learned that, pursuant to one or more PRA requests, the personal identifying information of a number of registered investment advisers and broker-dealers was inadvertently disclosed to persons not authorized to receive such information.

Our initial investigation revealed that your Social Security number was disclosed in a field entitled “Docket/Case #.” Since a docket or case number traditionally are not based on an individual’s Social Security number, we did not redact the contents of this field.

The department’s notification did not disclose how many investment advisers and broker-dealers were impacted by the breach, only that “one or more” PRA requestors were sent the information.

It’s not clear why this error occurred this time and was never addressed previously. Was this the first time DBO was using the FINRA CRD records or did FINRA change the types of information they include in each field?

 

 

Category: ExposureGovernment SectorU.S.

Post navigation

← NY: Bronx men sentenced for stealing Westchester IDs, $850K
“Denver VA blames TV station for data breach” →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.
  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news (Updated)
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report