DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

California Department of Business Oversight accidentally disclosed personal information to public records requestors

Posted on April 2, 2015 by Dissent

California’s Department of Business Oversight is notifying some investment advisers and dealer-brokers that due to a redaction error on the department’s part, their Social Security numbers were sent to public records requestors.

The breach, which occurred on January 5, was not discovered until March 11, and the department does not indicate how it first became aware of it.

In a notification letter dated March 23, the department explains:

The California Public Records Act (PRA) requires the Department of Business Oversight (DBO) to provide the public copies of the non-confidential portions of our electronic licensing records upon request. To process these requests, DBO utilizes the records contained in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) Central Registration Depository (CRD). Fields clearly designated as containing personal identifying information within the FINRA CRD are then redacted by DBO prior to its release. However, despite our efforts, DBO recently learned that, pursuant to one or more PRA requests, the personal identifying information of a number of registered investment advisers and broker-dealers was inadvertently disclosed to persons not authorized to receive such information.

Our initial investigation revealed that your Social Security number was disclosed in a field entitled “Docket/Case #.” Since a docket or case number traditionally are not based on an individual’s Social Security number, we did not redact the contents of this field.

The department’s notification did not disclose how many investment advisers and broker-dealers were impacted by the breach, only that “one or more” PRA requestors were sent the information.

It’s not clear why this error occurred this time and was never addressed previously. Was this the first time DBO was using the FINRA CRD records or did FINRA change the types of information they include in each field?

 

 

Related posts:

  • FINRA Fines D.A. Davidson & Co. $375,000 for Failure to Protect Confidential Customer Information
  • Updates to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Cybersecurity Requirements
  • FINRA Fines Centaurus Financial $175,000 for Failure to Protect Confidential Customer Information
Category: ExposureGovernment SectorU.S.

Post navigation

← NY: Bronx men sentenced for stealing Westchester IDs, $850K
“Denver VA blames TV station for data breach” →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Qantas customers involved in mammoth data breach
  • CMS Sending Letters to 103,000 Medicare beneficiaries whose info was involved in a Medicare.gov breach.
  • Esse Health provides update about April cyberattack and notifies 263,601 people
  • Terrible tales of opsec oversights: How cybercrooks get themselves caught
  • International Criminal Court hit with cyber attack during NATO summit
  • Pembroke Regional Hospital reported canceling appointments due to service delays from “an incident”
  • Iran-linked hackers threaten to release emails allegedly stolen from Trump associates
  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.