DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Do Experian’s board, investors, and public know the full extent of Experian’s security concerns?

Posted on October 8, 2015 by Dissent

Brian Krebs has a piece on security at Experian that I hope the FTC and Congress critters read.

One of the points I had made in my complaint to the FTC is that Experian’s multiple data security breaches were not disclosed in either its annual reports or reports to investors. Brian’s piece makes me wonder how much people at the top really knew/know about the extent of security problems or issues there and how much their rush to acquire new businesses may have been or be at the cost of security and due diligence.

Independent of the above, and after speaking with some reporters yesterday who were asking about my FTC complaint, I reflected, once again, about how little the general public knows about the fact that Experian has had so many breaches (by my standard). And I started pondering the following:

Suppose we – as consumers – could insist that Experian delete our records from their credit reporting database if we had been informed they had a breach involving our data.  “Equifax ,TransUnion, and Innovis can still have my data, but you, Experian, cannot, because you didn’t protect it adequately.”  What would happen then? Businesses that need to run our credit history could still obtain it, but not from Experian, right?

Would it be a good idea – and fair to consumers – to change the law so that consumers could demand our records be deleted from a credit reporting database if the entity had failed to protect our data adequately?  The T-Mobile breach didn’t even make a temporary blip in Experian’s business. Their site reports that they hold data on 890 MILLION individuals and 103 businesses. There has been no breach so costly as to really act as a deterrent or sufficient penalty. But what if they risked not being able to collect or store data? What if we had a system like South Korea where regulators barred entities from signing up new accounts for months as a punishment for data security failures? Not just for breaches, but for repeated breaches where the company had failed to address known risks (such as the Wyndham case)?

There has to be something we can do to protect consumers better.

Think about it while I go grab some more coffee.

 

 

 

Related posts:

  • FTC Takes Action Against Drizly and its CEO James Cory Rellas for Security Failures that Exposed Data of 2.5 Million Consumers
Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← Uber checks connections between hacker and Lyft
Maybe every e-commerce site should assume they were hacked last year →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake. (1)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.