DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

MaineGeneral breach update: investigation revealed additional PHI compromised

Posted on January 15, 2016 by Dissent

There’s an update to a breach reported by MaineGeneral Health in December after the FBI alerted them in November that information had been found on an external web site. At the time of their December notification, MG had noted that the scope of the incident was still under investigation.

Today, they issued a press release with an update. It reads, in part:

… MaineGeneral has determined additional protected health information impacting some individuals may have been accessed by the attacker. Letters to those impacted are being sent today, explaining the stage of the investigation, and ways individuals can protect themselves – including access to free credit monitoring and identity restoration services MaineGeneral is offering to those receiving letters of notification.

Information Compromised

While the FBI’s investigation continues, MaineGeneral’s investigation is nearing completion and the forensic team has determined that certain protected health information on its network was or may have been subject to unauthorized access on or about September 11 and 12, 2015, including:

  • The following information relating to patients referred for radiology services since June of 2009: name, address, date of birth, demographic information, medical information including name of referring physician and allergy information, Social Security number, medical insurance information, medical record number, emergency contact information, guarantor information, and employer information.
  • The names, Social Security numbers, addresses, phone numbers, attending physician name, account number and age of certain patients in a patient advocacy file.
  • The names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, addresses, medical record numbers, treatment information, and health history information of certain patients in a patient diagnostic registry file.
  • The names and addresses of certain patients, on a mailing list file related to a physician departure in October 2010.
  • The names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and medical identification numbers of certain patients in a monitoring system file.
  • The name, address, procedure date, procedure description, diagnosis and treatment choice of a patient in a letter to the patient.
  • The names, addresses and telephone numbers of certain employees.
  • The names, addresses and telephone numbers of certain prospective donors.

However, the information detected by the FBI on the external website was limited to the date of birth and emergency contact name, address, and telephone number for certain patients referred to MaineGeneral Medical Center for radiology services since June 2009, the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of certain employees, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of certain prospective donors. The data detected by the FBI on the external website does not contain Social Security numbers, patient names, patient medical or health insurance information, health records, driver’s license numbers, or credit/financial account information.

More information, including the full statement, is available on MaineGeneral’s website.

Category: ExposureHackHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← WV: Woman says St. Mary’s didn’t protect her medical records
MT: New West Medicare notifying 25,000 members whose unencrypted PHI were on stolen laptop (Updated) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.