DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

RubberStamps.net, Incipio notify customers of breaches

Posted on February 25, 2016 by Dissent

While uKnowKids had a somewhat despicable disclosure of their breach that involved shooting the messenger, here are two positive examples of breach disclosures I came across this week:

RubberStamps.net notified about 7,000 customers that its web site was compromised between November 3, 2015 to December 11, 2015. In a well-written letter, Scott Lee, the President and CEO, Superior Labels, Inc. explained that following reports from some customers of possible problems, the firm brought in experts and began investigating.

Based on our investigation, it appears that hackers used a security vulnerability in the WordPress blogging software to gain access to our order management system from November 3, 2015 to December 11, 2015.

The information that was possibly accessed included customers’  name, address, credit card number, billing and shipping address.

The firm began strengthening its security, and offered complimentary services through AllClear to those affected. It also created a toll-free number for them to call with any questions.

Given that customers contacted them after placing orders, it does sound like data from this breach may have been misused, even though the firm had no direct evidence of that as of the time of their February 19th notification letter.

Also this month, Incipio, LLC notified an unspecified number of customers that malware compromised orders placed online. The compromise, which affected one of their cloud-based servers, was discovered on February 4.

Despite our robust controls to protect you from the nefarious efforts of hackers, our investigation reveals that the unauthorized party gained access to personal information of customers who purchased product from www.incipio.com between September 26, 2015, and January 29, 2016.

Andy Fathollahi, Chairman and CEO, explained that the  information accessed likely included the customers’ name, address, phone number, email address, credit or debit card number, and payment card’s expiration date and cvv number.

The firm was not aware of any instance of fraud arising from the incident, but offered those affected services through Kroll.

 

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Thieves Are Using Ransomware Programs to ‘Kidnap’ People’s Data Until They Pay
Restitution amount must reflect complete accounting of intended loss: court →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Runsafe report: Medical device cyberattacks threaten patient care, strain budgets, top concern for healthcare sector
  • Ryuk ransomware’s initial access expert extradited to the U.S. from Ukraine
  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.