DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Lawsuit claims workers comp insurers hacked into injured workers’ files

Posted on April 25, 2016 by Dissent

Donna Mahoney reports:

A California worker claims in a federal lawsuit that three of the largest workers compensation insurance companies in California illegally hacked over 32,000 confidential workers comp files.

A lawsuit, which seeks class action status, was filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles against Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway Homestate, San Francisco-based Cypress Insurance, Woodland Hills, California-based Zenith Insurance, Palmdale, California-based HQSU Sign Up Services Inc. and two California private investigators hired by the insurers. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages from the alleged breach of personal information found in workers comp files.

Read more on Business Insurance.

This one sounds like it may have legs. Mahoney reports that with respect to the two investigators, one of whom was reportedly employed by Berkshire Hathaway and the other, who is reportedly employed by Zenith Insurance Company:

Mr. Reynolds has admitted to the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board to downloading over 33,000 workers comp files, the complaint reads. Mr. Glover also admitted to downloading workers comp files in a sworn deposition in a Los Angeles Superior Court case in 2015, according to court filings.

According to the complaint, the client records were hosted on HQSU’s server with only a username and password required to access and download lots of sensitive information on the clients such as home address, telephone numbers, birth date, Social Security number, email address, legal status, drivers license information, medical information, employment information, salary information and other personal information. The complaint also alleges that there is a video documenting the hack

which Plaintiff’s experts have identified as a directory traversal attack. Directory traversal is an HTTP exploit which allows attackers to access restricted directories and execute commands outside of the web server’s root directory.

The case is Adela Gonzalez v. Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies et al in the Central District of California, 2:16-cv-02690-DMG-RAO. The complaint alleges:

(1) Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. §1030 et seq.)
(2) Violation of Unlawful Access to Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. §2701 et seq.)
(3) Violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§2510 et seq.
(4) Invasion of Privacy (Public Disclosure of Private Facts)
(5) Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage
(6) Violation of the California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (Cal. Penal Code §502 et seq.)

Category: Business SectorHackHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Hundreds of Spotify credentials appear online – users report accounts hacked, emails changed
Presidential campaign apps expose personal data, report says →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Credit Control Corporation data allegedly from 9.1 million consumers listed for sale on forum
  • Copilot AI Bug Could Leak Sensitive Data via Email Prompts
  • FTC Provides Guidance on Updated Safeguards Rule
  • Sentara Health terminates remote employees after realizing they couldn’t be sure who was doing the work.
  • Hackers Break Into Car Sharing App, 8.4 Million Users Affected
  • Cyberattack pushes German napkin company into insolvency
  • WMATA Train Operators Arrested in Health Care Fraud Scheme
  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.