DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Demand letter served on poll body over disastrous ‘Comeleak’ breach

Posted on April 26, 2016 by Dissent

There continues to be a lot of media coverage of the COMELEC breach in the Philippines. Here’s an interesting response. Carlos Nazareno reports:

The Center for International Law Philippines (Centerlaw), a human rights legal group, delivered on Monday, April 25, a demand letter to the Commission on Elections (Comelec) over its possible failure to reasonably protect the sensitive private data of registered voters that resulted in the hacking and leaking incident dubbed #Comeleak.

In his individual capacity as a private citizen, Jose Ramon Albert, senior research fellow of the Philippine Institute for Development Studies, formally demanded that the Comelec notify the National Privacy Commission the nature of the breach, the sensitive personal information involved, and the measures taken by poll agency to address the breach and who are the officials designated by the Comelec as accountable for its compliance with RA 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

Albert, who is the former secretary general of the National Statistical Coordination Board and member of the Privacy Advisory Group of the United Nations Global Pulse, was assisted by lawyer Romel Bagares of Centerlaw.

The demand letter reminded members of the Comelec that, “Under Section 30 of the Data Privacy Act, it is a crime to conceal security breaches involving sensitive personal information, with a penalty of imprisonment of one year and six months to five years and a fine of not less than P500,000.00 but not more than P1,000,000.00.”

The Comelec has been given 24 hours to respond, after which a formal complaint will be filed against the poll body by Albert via Centerlaw before the National Privacy Commission.

Read more on Newsbytes.ph.

I don’t know if their approach will be effective, but I like it. It’s one thing to ask for more time to investigate, but it really doesn’t take that long to verify whether a leaked database contains real data, even if you haven’t verified all of it. Contrast COMELEC’s approach with that of the INE in Mexico who took a bit of time to investigate and then publicly confirmed that the leaked list was from the official February, 2015 list.

Governments need to be held strictly accountable when there’s a breach of this magnitude, and they need to be transparent. Keeping the public waiting for confirmation should result in heads rolling, criminal charges, or huge personal fines that insurance will not cover.


Related:

  • 'Trickery and f...ery': Agency under fire over senior manager's 'serious' privacy breach
  • Software companies must be held liable for British economic security, say MPs
  • Russia arrests young cybersecurity entrepreneur on treason charges
  • UK privacy regulator has seen ‘collapse in enforcement activity,’ rights coalition says
  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
  • Ph: Department of the Interior and Local Government to probe alleged data breach by hackers
Category: ExposureGovernment SectorHackNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Hacker With Victims in 100 Nations Gets 7 Years in Prison
VEHICLE CYBERSECURITY: DOT and Industry Have Efforts Under Way, but DOT Needs to Define Its Role in Responding to a Real-world Attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Leavenworth, Kansas cyberattack disrupts city services
  • They’ve escaped a lot of media attention, but Anubis RaaS is a threat to the medical sector
  • “In the most expedient time possible…”
  • Portugal updates cybercrime law to exempt security researchers
  • LockBit 5’s “new secure blog domain” infra leaked already
  • NL: Nuenen accidentally leaks addresses of 1,000 asylum center opponents
  • Ex-teen hackers warn parents are clueless as children steal ‘millions’
  • UK Government Considers Computer Misuse Act Revision
  • Japan issues arrest warrant against teen suspected of cyberattack using AI
  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.