DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Romanian hacker Guccifer: I breached Clinton server, ‘it was easy’

Posted on May 4, 2016 by Dissent

Catherine Herridge and Pamela K. Browne report on a jail-house interview with Marcel Lehel Lazar, aka, “Guccifer,” about how he hacked then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email server. You read their story on Fox News. If he’s telling the truth, there was nothing very sophisticated about his approach.

No related posts.

Category: Government SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← CA: Humboldt County Notice of Data Breach
Following massive data leak, Mexico restricts information on voter lists given to political parties →

3 thoughts on “Romanian hacker Guccifer: I breached Clinton server, ‘it was easy’”

  1. Anonymous says:
    May 5, 2016 at 8:35 am

    The Fox News about the hacker and Clinton email server article is very careful how it words their input. The seem cautious about what the hacker claims he has accessed on the Clinton email server. The hacker also claims that he has 2GB worth of data that’s too hot, and is on interest to national security. Some how, all this hype about the Clinton email server and hacker is unfolding closer and closer to election day. I won’t get into the political side of this.

    The more time the Feds have to dig around, the more pieces of the puzzle they will find. Now they have 2 major players. One that was the email server administrator, and on the other end, the hacker that supposedly breached the Clinton server. The problem here is that the so-called accused member is of the same party alignment as the President. I am sure it there was one that was a republican or an Independent and a Democrat, it would be handled in a different manner.

    No matter the party alignment, the handling of US state secrets shows NO due care or NO due diligence. The Clinton email server was set up in order to serve the needs of some one that has no concept of what national security secrets are, no does Clinton appear to care. This is when Clinton held a role in which she had access to many secrets. It does not matter whether or not the markings were taken off the emails or correspondence. All it takes is a bit of brains to match up two like items. Prove that Clinton had a copy of a secret document on her server without the markings. Prove that she had read the same message WITH the security markings intact. This proves that she has items on her server that were improperly marked. Clinton and her email server can plead the ignorance, assuming she even cares about the situation. Clinton will say anything she wants – why? Because once the FBI, DIA and other entities collect the necessary facts, she will be headed to criminal court, and her true reputation will be seen for what it is.

    1. Jordana Ari says:
      May 5, 2016 at 2:00 pm

      I agree with Anonymous. This will not bode well for H.R.C in regards to her email security. Also, it substantiates her opponents claims about using her private email server for classified information.

      1. Dissent says:
        May 5, 2016 at 2:12 pm

        Remember that the FBI examined the server and said they found no evidence of classified info – or info that was classified at the time.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake. (1)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.