DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

An Assessment of the Anthem Data Breach Litigation Rulings

Posted on August 8, 2016 by Dissent

David Silverman writes:

[Eric’s intro: this blog post helps distill Judge Koh’s two rulings, In re Anthem Inc. Data Breach Litig., No. 15-MD-02617 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2016) (“Anthem I”) and In re Anthem Inc. Data Breach Litig., No. 15-MD-02617 (N.D. Cal. May 27, 2016) (“Anthem II”). These are complicated opinions, and I hope this post helps you wade through them.]

Following her ruling denying in part the motions to dismiss in the Adobe breach case, Judge Koh has again gone against the tide and filed two more plaintiff-friendly opinions on the viability of class action data breach claims.  Defense counsel seeking practice pointers would note the failure effectively to exclude third party beneficiaries as enforcers of a data management agreement, and the use of integration clauses that inadvertently opened the door to making privacy notices enforceable parts of a contract.

Read more on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.


Related:

  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
  • Ph: Department of the Interior and Local Government to probe alleged data breach by hackers
  • Cyberattack disables Onsolve Code Red emergency alert system across St. Louis region (1)
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHackHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Nurse’s Gory Tweets Result in Lawsuit
Missouri man repeat offender on fraud and identity theft? →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Google and Apple roll out emergency security updates after zero-day attacks
  • Doxers Posing as Cops Are Tricking Big Tech Firms Into Sharing People’s Private Data
  • Virginia Urology Silent on Possible Data Breach as Purported Patient Data Begins to Leak
  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Tool allows stealthy tracking of Signal and WhatsApp users through delivery receipts
  • Oh Great, Smart Glasses That Record Everything You Say
  • CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices
  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.