DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Analysis of World Check data leak by Risk Based Security: Hackers & Collectives

Posted on August 10, 2016 by Dissent

From RBS:

In early July, it was revealed that a Thomson Reuters service known as World-Check had licensed information to a client that subsequently failed to secure the database. The leak, discovered by Chris Vickery, affected over 2.2 million persons identified as “heightened-risk individuals” that had been included in the World-Check database between 3/17/2000 and 9/17/2014.

Shortly after the discovery, Risk Based Security performed an analysis of the data and published our findings. The original analysis included a review of the type of data discovered, along with some statistics for the various data field options.  While this provided good insight into the type of persons and organizations tracked by the service, our researchers felt that there was more to the story specifically as it relates to our work on the Arrest Tracker project. A follow-on analysis was done, looking more closely at entries relating to hackers, hacktivism and information security in general. After searching for notable names in the dataset, we discovered that convicted hackers, known hacker groups and collectives had been entered into the World-Check database. The results were interesting, with some anticipated findings as well as some surprises.

Considering that World-Check could be considered a blacklist of sorts and is used to comply with Know Your Customer regulations, the additional analysis provides even more insight into how these systems work.

Read their whole report, as it lists well-known collectives from recent years (they found 130 collectives), individuals, and the kinds of sources World Check uses in compiling information. With respect to individuals, they report:

In total, research identified approximately 36 individuals within the dataset with the TERRORISM classification and corresponding links to cyber crime. Stepping back from the TERRORISM label, our researchers identified 931 entries out of a total of 2,248,125 entries in the database that were directly related to cybercrime.

With respect to sources World Check uses, in addition to expected resources like DOJ and mainstream news outlets, DataBreaches.net has reportedly been cited as a reference in their report(s), as is cyberwarnews.info, HackRead, and thehackernews.com. Well, we knew our work may not meet Google’s demands for what’s considered a “news” site, but those looking for info on hacking and hackers seem to know where to find it.

CORRECTION: Post-publication, thehackernews.com url was corrected. Thanks to the alert reader who caught my error, which I, in turn, blame on RBS. 🙂

No related posts.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHackOf Note

Post navigation

← The Nauru files: cache of 2,000 leaked reports reveal scale of abuse of children in Australian offshore detention
Former IRS employee sentenced to federal prison for ID theft, fraud →

2 thoughts on “Analysis of World Check data leak by Risk Based Security: Hackers & Collectives”

  1. Regret says:
    August 10, 2016 at 1:02 pm

    Check your url on “thehackernews.net. I didn’t find this domain, but found http://thehackernews.com/ instead.

    1. Dissent says:
      August 10, 2016 at 1:43 pm

      Yep, you’re right…. I thought it looked wrong as I typed it, but I went with what RBS had reported. That’ll teach me…. 🙂

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Russia Jailed Hacker Who Worked for Ukrainian Intelligence to Launch Cyberattacks on Critical Infrastructure
  • Kentfield Hospital victim of cyberattack by World Leaks, patient data involved
  • India’s Max Financial says hacker accessed customer data from its insurance unit
  • Brazil’s central bank service provider hacked, $140M stolen
  • Iranian and Pro-Regime Cyberattacks Against Americans (2011-Present)
  • Nigerian National Pleads Guilty to International Fraud Scheme that Defrauded Elderly U.S. Victims
  • Nova Scotia Power Data Breach Exposed Information of 280,000 Customers
  • No need to hack when it’s leaking: Brandt Kettwick Defense edition
  • SK Telecom to be fined for late data breach report, ordered to waive cancellation fees, criminal investigation into them launched
  • Louis Vuitton Korea suffers cyberattack as customer data leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.