DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Family & Sports Medicine center patient records remain inaccessible three months after ransomware attack

Posted on December 28, 2016 by Dissent

Add Desert Care Family & Sports Medicine in Casa Grande, Arizona to the list of health facilities who suffered a ransomware attack. But what happened to them has resulted in my updating my worst breaches of 2016 list.

On December 20, the center notified HHS that 500 patients were being notified that their server had been infected in August 2016. Of note, not only were the data on the server encrypted – including patient records – but Desert Care took the server to several IT specialists who were all reportedly unable to break the encryption.

“As a result,” their patient notification letter explains, “the server remains locked and encrypted by the ransom ware, and patient records are unavailable.”

They do not explain whether they paid the ransom, and if they didn’t, why they hadn’t once they determined that they could no longer access patient records. And for the center to write that three months after a ransomware attack, “patient records are unavailable” raises several additional questions, including whether there had been any backup, and if so, what happened to it (and if there was no backup, why not)?

Information on the server included patient’s “full name date of birth, home address, account number, diagnosis, types of treatment information, disability codes, etc.”

To add to their regulatory woes, not only was the center unable to recover access to their patient records, but they were also unable to determine if patient records were exposed or acquired.

“We have not received any indication that the information on the server has been accessed or used by an unauthorized individual, but Desert Care cannot be sure of this, so it is providing you with this notice out of an abundance of caution,” they write.

DataBreaches.net sent an inquiry to the center asking whether they were subsequently able to determine what type of ransomware was involved, and whether they had any backup of their patient records, as their statement seems to suggest that there may be no backup that they could use to recover patient information.
This post will be updated if a response is received.

No related posts.

Category: HackHealth DataMalwareOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← TheDarkOverlord reveals three more attacks, with more to be revealed
Hit by ransomware, Brandywine Pediatrics recovers quickly and notifies patients →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.