DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Princeton University becomes victim of MongoDB ransom attacks

Posted on January 10, 2017 by Dissent

Princeton University became one of the more than 27,000 entities that recently had their databases wiped by attackers who claim that if victims pay ransom, they’ll get their data back.  The attackers have been able to access and overwrite databases in MongoDB installations that were left open on Port 27017. With no login or authentication required, anyone can access the files, exfiltrate them, edit them to corrupt the data, or just delete them all. In these cases, the attackers are deleting the databases.

The attack on Princeton was first detected by DataBreaches.net on January 7, and confirmed by Victor Gevers, the ethical hacker and founder of GDI who has been responsible for thousands of notifications.

Directory listing shows the replacement database
After the attack, the database was replaced with a database called PLEASE_READ that contained the ransom demand.

In this case, the replacement database provided an email address of [email protected] and the following note:

SEND 0.2 BTC TO THIS ADDRESS 1Hhb4rJY7hYFMLwE1j1834zWsNBRWXN9Sv AND CONTACT THIS EMAIL WITH YOUR IP OF YOUR SERVER TO RECOVER YOUR DATABASE !

The ransom demand that replaced Princeton’s database in their MongoDB installation.

DataBreaches.net sent notification to Princeton immediately and requested a statement from them as to what kinds of data were in the database – specifically, whether it included any student, faculty, or staff personal information.

A spokesperson informed DataBreaches.net today that the university would have no comment on the incident.  We don’t know, therefore, whether the data were exfiltrated or just deleted. The second thing we don’t know is whether this was a production database with unencrypted personal information or some other type of database. And third, we do not know whether the database was under Princeton’s direct control or under the control of one of their vendors.

Some transparency seems important here. If you’re a student or faculty member at Princeton, you may want to contact them and ask them for a direct answer as to whether unencrypted personal information was in that database.

And if you find out, please let this site know and we’ll update this post.

 


Related:

  • Little Rock Psychologist Indicted by Federal Grand Jury for Defrauding Medicare and Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield
  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
  • Ph: Department of the Interior and Local Government to probe alleged data breach by hackers
  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident' impacting city's IT systems
Category: Education SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← HHS OCR: Henrico Sen. Dunnavant’s political letter to patients broke health privacy rules, but no sanctions needed
Cosmetic surgery center discloses ransomware attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers
  • South Korea police raid e-commerce giant Coupang over data leak; govt schedules hearing

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.