DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Samsung Leaking Customer Info, Tells Customer to Take It Up with the Shipper?!

Posted on March 16, 2017 by Dissent

From the add-this-to-the-list-of-concerns-about-Samsung dept.

Matt Metzger writes:

About four months ago, I ordered a new TV directly from Samsung’s online store. A few days later, I received a tracking link via email.

http://www.agsystems.com/listhawb.asp?searchtype=hawb&searchvalue=1138977

Reusing Tracking Numbers
When I first received the link, it showed an order that wasn’t my own. I assumed there was some sort of clerical error, but I was too busy at the time to contact Samsung about it. When I checked back later in the day, there were now two orders showing at the link Samsung sent me — my own, and the other order.

Read more on Medium. Matt not only identifies the scope of the problem – which goes beyond just the tracking info – and the risks, but he also includes Samsung’s totally-less-than-acceptable-and-pretty-outrageous response to his notification that they have a problem.

Whether the problem starts with Samsung or their shipper is irrelevant: it is Samsung customer data, and Samsung should damned well step up to the plate and get these problems addressed. And until they do, if you don’t want all your personal information shared on the internet and indexed by Google, maybe you should think twice about ordering anything from them that requires shipment to your home.

Related posts:

  • Samsung says customer data stolen in July data breach
Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesExposureSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← NZ: CYF ‘stuff-up’ fuels privacy concerns
Russian Hacker “Kolypto” Who Worked on Citadel Trojan Extradited to the US →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records
  • Qilin claims attack on Accu Reference Medical Laboratory. It wasn’t the lab’s first data breach.
  • Louis Vuitton hit by data breach in Türkiye, over 140,000 users exposed; UK customers also affected (1)
  • Infosys McCamish Systems Enters Consent Order with Vermont DFR Over Cyber Incident
  • Obligations under Canada’s data breach notification law
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • Air Force Employee Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Disclose Unlawfully Classified National Defense Information

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act
  • Department of Justice Subpoenas Doctors and Clinics Involved in Performing Transgender Medical Procedures on Children
  • Google Settles Privacy Class Action Over Period Tracking App
  • ICE Is Searching a Massive Insurance and Medical Bill Database to Find Deportation Targets

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.