DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: Employee fired for allegedly ‘snooping’ into patient records

Posted on September 10, 2017 by Dissent

Arthur White-Crummey reports:

The Prince Albert Parkland Health Region has fired an employee for allegedly “snooping” into the medical records of her own family members.

According to a report of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, the employee improperly accessed the patient information of 14 people, including several family members. The health region detected the breach on June 14 through an audit.

The employee, who is not named in the report, had already been disciplined for similar behaviour. In May, she allegedly snooped on two patients using the Pharmaceutical Information Program and was suspended for five days.

Read more on Prince Albert Daily Herald .  A search of DataBreaches.net reveals that this is not the first time we’ve seen a report of employee snooping into patient records for this region.  I wonder what measures the region has taken that the IPC has found satisfactory.

Related:

Investigation Report 136-2017

Prince Albert Parkland Regional Health Authority August 31, 2017

HIPA 2(m), 2(q), 2(t)(ii), 2(u), 23(1), 26(1), 26(2); LA FOIP 2(f)(xiii), 28(2)(s); LA FOIP Reg 10(g)

Through an audit and an investigation, Prince Albert Parkland Regional Health Authority (Parkland) detected that an employee snooped into the patient records of 14 individuals, including several family members and her own patient record. The Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC) agreed with Parkland’s finding that the root cause of the privacy breach was the employee intentionally breaching privacy. He also found that Parkland has taken appropriate steps to prevent similar privacy breaches in the future. The IPC made a couple of recommendations, including Parkland forward its investigation file to the Ministry of Justice, Public Prosecutions Division to determine whether an offence has occurred and whether charges should be laid under The Health Information Protection Act (HIPA).


Related:

  • ‘People have had to move house’: Inside the British Library, two years on from devastating cyber attack
  • Veradigm's Breach Claims Under Scrutiny After Dark Web Leak
  • Massive Great Firewall Leak Exposes 500GB of Censorship Data
  • UK: Woman charged after NHS patients' records accessed in data breach
  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • Legal Aid Agency chief admits difficulties understanding impact of cyberattack
Category: Health DataInsiderNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← CO: More than 4,000 Rio Blanco County residents notified of 2016 data breach by state
UP STF busts gang which hacked secure source code to crack Aadhaar, issued fake biometric cards →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
  • HIPAA, but for non-Covered Entities?
  • Manassas City Public Schools close on Monday due to cyberattack
  • San Joaquin County Superior Court concludes sensitive info leaked in data breach
  • NCCIA arrests man over massive data breach involving millions of Pakistanis
  • Defense Contractors Are Silencing Their Cybersecurity Watchdogs
  • Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Standing in Data Breach Class Actions
  • ALT5 Sigma sues former consultant over alleged data breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.