DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

QuadMed health records system issue affected onsite clinics of three clients

Posted on March 1, 2018 by Dissent

One of the incidents reported to HHS this month was an incident reported by QuadMed in Wisconsin. Today, I finally found some documentation as to what that incident was all about.

As background, QuadMed describes itself as providing occupational health and primary care services to some clients. In some cases, they may take over an onsite clinic at a client’s. When that happens, QuadMed and the client may agree or arrange that health-related information from the clinic will be stored in a shared records system that both QuadMed and some of the client’s employees can access.

And that’s pretty much what they did with three of their clients: Hillenbrand, Stoughton Trailers and the Whirlpool Corporation.

QuadMed took over the Hillenbrand onsite clinic on November 7, 2013. According to a statement they issued, on December 26, 2017, QuadMed became aware of a potential technical issue that enabled Hillenbrand employees to access more information than they should have been able to access.  Whether that unintended access existed since November 2013 was not clear, but that information included employees’ name, date(s) of services or treatment at the onsite clinic, and medical information, such as test or evaluation results, diagnoses, and information related to medical history, examinations, physicals, screenings, vaccinations, travel medicine, and/or workers’ compensation information.

In response to the incident, QuadMed and Hillenbrand implemented new administrative and technical controls and re-educated employees on HIPAA.

QuadMed also took over the Stoughton Trailers onsite clinic. According to their statement, on December 26, 2017, QuadMed also became aware of the potential technical issue with access to that clinic’s record system (as with the Hillenbrand situation). Their investigation determined that certain Stoughton Trailers’ employees had access to more information in that system, as well as through other electronic means, than should have been permissible since May 9, 2016.

Starting in January 2017, QuadMed also took over the onsite clinic at Whirlpool Corporation’s Clyde, Ohio plant.  On February 6, 2017, QuadMed recognized that there was an issue, and according to their statement, was working to investigate and then remedy the issue since that time. “In October 2017,” they write,  “QuadMed was granted with the needed level of system access to more thoroughly investigate the issue. QuadMed subsequently determined this notification was appropriate.”

QuadMed’s report to HHS indicated that 4,549 patients were affected.

 

Category: Breach IncidentsExposure

Post navigation

← Tufts Health Plan notifies 70,320 members after vendor error exposes information in envelope window
Amazon Releases New Guidance on AWS and FERPA →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.