DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Protection of Patient Health Information at Navy and Air Force Military Treatment Facilities

Posted on May 9, 2018 by Dissent

Audit: DODIG-2018-109 (pdf)

From the audit’s findings:

Officials from the DHA, Navy, and Air Force did not consistently implement security protocols to protect systems that stored, processed, and transmitted EHRs and PHI at the locations tested. Specifically, we identified issues at the Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton; San Diego Naval Medical Center; USNS Mercy; 436th Medical Group; and Wright-Patterson Medical Center related to:

  • accessing networks using multifactor authentication;
  • configuring passwords to meet DoD length and complexity requirements;
  • mitigate known network vulnerabilities;
  • granting users access based on the user’s assigned duties;
  • configuring systems to automatically lock after 15 minutes of inactivity;
  • reviewing system activity reports to identify unusual or suspicious activities and access;
  • developing standard operating procedures to manage system access;
  • implementing adequate physical security protocols to protect electronic and paper records containing PHI from unauthorized access;
  • maintaining an inventory of all Service specific systems operating that stored, processed, and transmitted PHI; and
  • developing or maintaining privacy impact assessments.

Officials from the DHA, Navy, and Air Force did not consistently implement security protocols to protect systems that stored, processed, and transmitted EHRs and PH for a variety of reasons including lack of resources and guidance, system incompatibility, and vendor limitations.

Without well-defined, effectively implemented system security protocols, the DHA, Navy, and Air Force compromised the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of PHI. In addition, ineffective administrative, technical, and physical security protocols that result in a violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 could cost the MTFs up to $1.5 million per year in penalties for each category of violation.

Read more on DODIG.

via Histalk


Related:

  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP's report on Nova RaaS
  • John P. Meehan Agency was hacked in July 2024. Affected customers were first finding out in November 2025.
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesGovernment SectorHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Equifax breach: worse than they thought
The Oregon Clinic notifies patients after employee email account hacked →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Google and Apple roll out emergency security updates after zero-day attacks
  • Doxers Posing as Cops Are Tricking Big Tech Firms Into Sharing People’s Private Data
  • Virginia Urology Silent on Possible Data Breach as Purported Patient Data Begins to Leak
  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Slovenian officials weaponize data-privacy laws against investigative journalism
  • End-of-Year 2025 State and Federal Developments in Minors’ Privacy
  • Tool allows stealthy tracking of Signal and WhatsApp users through delivery receipts
  • Oh Great, Smart Glasses That Record Everything You Say
  • CBP Agents Held This U.S. Citizen for Hours Until He Agreed To Let Them Search His Electronic Devices

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.