DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Yahoo! UK fined £250,000 by ICO after systemic failures put customer data at risk

Posted on June 12, 2018 by Dissent

From the ICO’s office:

Yahoo! UK Services Limited has been fined £250,000 by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) following a cyber-attack in November 2014. The incident was publicly disclosed in September 2016, almost two years after it had taken place.

Because of when the breach happened, the ICO’s investigation was carried out under the Data Protection Act 1998.

It considered the circumstances under which the personal data of approximately 500 million international users of Yahoo!’s services was placed at risk. In particular, the ICO focused on the 515,121 UK accounts, that Yahoo! UK Services Limited – based in London – had responsibility for as a data controller.

The compromised personal data included names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, hashed passwords, and encrypted or unencrypted security questions and answers.

ICO Deputy Commissioner of Operations, James Dipple-Johnstone, said in a blog about the ICO investigation:

“People expect that organisations will keep their personal data safe from malicious intruders who seek to exploit it.

“The failings our investigation identified are not what we expect from a company that had ample opportunity to implement appropriate measures, and potentially stop UK citizens’ data being compromised.”

In summary, the investigation found that:

  • Yahoo! UK Services Ltd failed to take appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect the data of 515,121 customers against exfiltration by unauthorised persons;
  • The company failed to take appropriate measures to ensure that its data processor – Yahoo! Inc – complied with the appropriate data protection standards;
  • It also failed to ensure appropriate monitoring was in place to protect the credentials of Yahoo! employees with access to Yahoo! customer data;
  • The inadequacies found had been in place for a long period of time without being discovered or addressed.

The ICO considered the breach to be a serious contravention of Principle 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998, which states that appropriate technical and organisational measures must be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data.

Under the 1998 Act, the ICO has the power to impose a maximum fine of £500,000.

Mr Dipple-Johnstone said:

“Cyber-attacks will happen, that’s just a fact, and we fully accept that they are a criminal act. But as the intruders become more sophisticated and more determined, organisations need to make it as difficult as possible for them to get in. But they must also remember that it’s no good locking the door if you leave the key under the mat.”

Since the ICO investigation, data protection law has changed. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect on 25 May 2018.

Mr Dipple-Johnstone added:

“Under the GDPR and the new Data Protection Act 2018, individuals have stronger rights and more control and choice over their personal data. If organisations, especially well-resourced, experienced ones, do not properly safeguard their customers’ personal data, they may find customers taking their business elsewhere.”


Related:

  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
  • Ph: Department of the Interior and Local Government to probe alleged data breach by hackers
  • Cyberattack disables Onsolve Code Red emergency alert system across St. Louis region (1)
  • Des Moines Man Charged with Computer Fraud
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
Category: Business SectorHackOf Note

Post navigation

← Data leak hits Trident Group, cyber crime cell registers FIR
Dixons Says Almost 6 Million Cards Targeted in Cyberattack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • UK Government Considers Computer Misuse Act Revision
  • Japan issues arrest warrant against teen suspected of cyberattack using AI
  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)
  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS
  • KR: Privacy Commissioner’s Office Urges the Public to Beware of Fraudsters Exploiting the Tai Po Fire Disaster
  • Cyber attack on Indian airports? Govt explains the scary threat that disrupted 400 flights last month.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.