DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Database leaks 250K legal documents, some marked ‘not designated for publication’

Posted on March 16, 2019 by Dissent

Catalin Cimpanu reports:

A database containing 257,287 legal documents, with some marked as “not designated for publication,” was left exposed on the public internet without a password, allowing anyone to access and download a treasure trove of sensitive legal materials.

The database, which was left online for roughly two weeks, contained unpublished legal documents relating to US court cases, the security researcher who found it told ZDNet.

Read more on ZDNet.

But were the files really a trove of sensitive materials?  I don’t think “unpublished” means what the researcher seemed to be suggesting it might mean.  As I understand it (and I could be wrong, of course), an unpublished opinion or one “not designated for publication” is not one that has to be kept sealed or confidential. It is simply an opinion that the court doesn’t want future cases citing as precedential. The opinions are available and I think they can even be cited to try to persuade a court, but they are not precedential. I’ve reached out to a lawyer to try to get clarification on my understanding, but if I’m correct, then:

What did the researcher really find in terms of sensitivity or confidentiality? Did any of the filings contain sensitive information? The researcher’s report offers no redacted samples of any filing had been marked “SEALED” or “CONFIDENTIAL” or anything like that, so DataBreaches.net reached out to Security Discovery to see if there were sealed files in the leak.  Bob Diachenko responded that

there were references to “sealed” cases throughout the texts, with descriptions of the cases.  But most of the cases were marked as ‘not designated for publication’, ‘not to be published in the official reports’ + references to sealed cases.

So it’s still not clear whether there any actual exhibits or files that were stamped “sealed” or “confidential” or if there was just sanitized references to sealed cases.

In any event, the leak shouldn’t have happened, and it’s not even clear whose leak it was.

 

No related posts.

Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Some job applicants are first learning about the May, 2018 JobScience breach. Why?
Student information: Mississippi reaches agreement with Questar over data breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Avantic Medical Lab hacked; patient data leaked by Everest Group
  • Integrated Oncology Network victim of phishing attack; multiple locations affected (2)
  • HHS’ Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule Investigation with Deer Oaks Behavioral Health for $225k and a Corrective Action Plan
  • HB1127 Explained: North Dakota’s New InfoSec Requirements for Financial Corporations
  • Credit reports among personal data of 190,000 breached, put for sale on Dark Web; IT vendor fined
  • Five youths arrested on suspicion of phishing
  • Russia Jailed Hacker Who Worked for Ukrainian Intelligence to Launch Cyberattacks on Critical Infrastructure
  • Kentfield Hospital victim of cyberattack by World Leaks, patient data involved
  • India’s Max Financial says hacker accessed customer data from its insurance unit
  • Brazil’s central bank service provider hacked, $140M stolen

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Google Settles Privacy Class Action Over Period Tracking App
  • ICE Is Searching a Massive Insurance and Medical Bill Database to Find Deportation Targets
  • Franklin, Tennessee Resident Sentenced to 30 Months in Federal Prison on Multiple Cyber Stalking Charges
  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.