DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Proposed settlement agreement between Texas and OCR concerning a 2015 breach

Posted on March 26, 2019 by Dissent

The following analysis in the Texas Senate suggests that OCR and Texas have been negotiating a resolution agreement since Texas first reported this breach in June, 2015.

Not only does that seem like a long time for this to be going on, but if you were to look at HHS’s public breach tool to see the entry on the breach in question, you’d find that it is not in the “Under Investigation” section, but rather, it is filed under the “Archived” list — even though there is no closing entry or resolution noted. Filing it as “archived” seems a bit misleading if OCR is still negotiating a settlement with them. In any event, I’m guessing that we will see some announcement of a resolution from HHS/OCR soon.


BILL ANALYSIS

Senate Research Center S.C.R. 21
86R12119 KSM-F By: Kolkhorst
Health & Human Services
3/25/2019
As Filed

AUTHOR’S / SPONSOR’S STATEMENT OF INTENT

On June 11, 2015, the Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS), a “covered entity” under Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules (HIPAA Rules), filed a breach notification report with the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) stating that an impermissible disclosure of unsecured electronic protected health information (ePHI) in violation of HIPAA Rules had occurred when a DADS web application was accessible to unauthorized parties.

On July 23, 2015, OCR notified DADS of its investigation of DADS compliance with the HIPAA Rules and determined that:

  • DADS failed to conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI held by the covered entity. (See 45 C.F.R. Section 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A));
  • DADS failed to implement appropriate technical policies and procedures for electronic information systems that maintain electronic protected health information to allow access only to those persons or software programs that have been granted access rights as specified in 45 C.F.R. Section 164.308(a)(4). (See 45 C.F.R. Section 164.312(a)(1))
  • DADS failed to implement appropriate hardware, software, and/or procedural mechanisms that record and examine activity in information systems that contained or used ePHI. (See 45 C.F.R. Section 164.312(b));
  • As a result of its failure to appropriately safeguard the ePHI in a web-based application, DADS impermissibly disclosed the ePHI of up to 6,617 individuals. (See 45 C.F.R. Section 164.502(a)); and

OCR presented the State of Texas a Resolution Agreement with Corrective Action Plan (the “Settlement Agreement”) in lieu of civil monetary penalties and to provide DADS an opportunity to correct DADS’ failures to safeguard ePHI.

The State of Texas has presented a counter-proposal to the Settlement Agreement to OCR that applies to those covered functions and information resources involved in the breach that were formerly operated by DADS but that have been transferred to the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC).

The proposed Settlement Agreement comprises the following terms and conditions:

Payment. OCR has agreed to deduct, and HHSC agrees to not contest deduction by OCR, the amount of $1,600,000.00 (“Resolution Amount” or “RA”) on or before May 31, 2019, from any sum owing to HHSC from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services pursuant to 45 C.F.R. Section 160.424(c).

Corrective Action Plan. HHSC has entered into and agrees to comply with a Corrective Action Plan (“CAP”). If HHSC breaches the CAP, and fails to cure the breach as set forth in the CAP, then HHSC will be in breach of the Settlement Agreement and OCR will not be subject to the release set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Compliance with the RA/CAP of the Settlement Agreement by HHSC is conditioned upon HHSC obtaining the approval of, and appropriation of funds needed to comply with, the RA/CAP by the Legislature of the State of Texas. (See Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 111.003(b)). The term of the Corrective Action Plan will be three (3) years from the effective date of the proposed agreement.

Release by OCR. In consideration of and conditioned upon performance by HHSC of its obligations under the proposed Settlement Agreement, OCR releases HHSC from any actions it may have against HHSC under the HIPAA Rules arising out of or related to the conduct identified in paragraph 2 of this concurrent resolution. OCR does not release HHSC from, nor waive any rights, obligations, or causes of action other than those arising out of or related to said conduct and referred to in this paragraph.

Agreement by Released Parties. HHSC shall not contest the validity of its obligation to pay, nor the amount of, the Resolution Amount or any other obligations agreed to under the proposed Settlement Agreement. HHSC waives all procedural rights granted under Section 1128A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Section 1320a-7a); and 45 C.F.R. Part 160, Subpart E; and claims collection regulations at 45 C.F.R. Part 30, including, but not limited to, notice, hearing, and appeal with respect to the Resolution Amount.

Section 111.003(a)(2), Civil Practice and Remedies Code, requires the legislature to approve a settlement of a claim or action against the state if the settlement commits the state to a course of action that in reasonable probability will entail a continuing increased expenditure of state funds over subsequent state fiscal biennia.

The CAP of the proposed agreement commits the State of Texas to a course of action that in reasonable probability entails a continuing increased expenditure of state funds over subsequent state fiscal biennia

RESOLVED

That the 86th Legislature of the State of Texas approve the proposed Settlement Agreement.

Source: Texas.gov.

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesGovernment SectorHackHealth DataOf Note

Post navigation

← Butler County employee suspended after emailing spreadsheet with personal information
Ca: Privacy breach at Nanaimo hospital after health records illicitly accessed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.