DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

M.D. Anderson’s $4.3 Million Fine for Patient Data Loss Vacated

Posted on January 14, 2021 by Dissent

This is huge.  Mary Anne Pazanowski reports:

The University of Texas’s M.D. Anderson Cancer Center dodged a $4.3 million fine for losing over 35,000 people’s protected health information after the Fifth Circuit ruled Thursday that HHS acted arbitrarily and capriciously in finding that the provider violated two information security regulations.

You can read more on Bloomberg Law if you have a subscription.

Here is the opinion. Apparently HHS realized it wouldn’t be able to defend its penalty. In the background section:

M.D. Anderson unsuccessfully worked its way through two levels of administrative appeals. Then it petitioned our court for review. See 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a(e) (authorizing judicial review). After M.D. Anderson filed its petition, the Government conceded that it could not defend its penalty and asked us to reduce it by a factor of 10 to $450,000.

What a shame that they put the cancer center through so many appeals before they would acknowledge that.  In any event, the civil monetary penalty (CMP) was vacated by the court, and the case remanded.

This opinion will likely make it more difficult to get entities to settle complaints, as it seems to keep the bar high for what HHS must show if it is going to impose a CMP.

I look forward to seeing what HIPAA lawyers think of this one.

 

Category: FederalHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Hong Kong internet firm blocked website over security law
National Detergent Company in Oman Hit by Cyberattack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news (Updated)
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay
  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.