DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

21 months after a ransomware attack, a business associate breach first shows up on HHS’s breach tool. Here’s why.

Posted on March 16, 2021 by Dissent

HIPAA Journal reports on an incident that is illustrative of the challenges entities may face in the wake of a ransomware attack — determining whether a breach is a reportable incident or not. It also illustrates what may happen if an entity decides something is not a reportable breach but further investigation by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) suggests otherwise.

In this case, Metro Presort in Oregon experienced a ransomware attack in May, 2019. They reportedly contained it relatively quickly and recovered from it, reportedly refusing to pay the ransom demanded by Ryuk threat actors. Metro did not report it as a reportable breach under HIPAA because the ePHI on their system was already encrypted (by them) prior to the attack, so the threat actors should not have been able to access any unencrypted ePHI.

Their investigation had found no evidence that any ePHI had been accessed, exfiltrated, or misused. But reinvestigation in October 2020 raised some doubts that  the ePHI had been encrypted before the attack.  In its November 2020 web notice, Metro Presort does not explain why they reinvestigated in October 2020, but an update in that statement suggests that they reinvestigated at OCR’s instigation:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”), which is the federal agency responsible for enforcing the federal health information privacy law known as HIPAA, investigated the incident, MPI’s response, and MPI’s data privacy and security practices. On December 31, 2020, OCR issued a ruling finding no violations of HIPAA and closing its investigation.

HIPAA Journal reports:

The incident has recently appeared on the HHS’ Office for Civil Rights website stating the PHI of up to 38,387 individuals may have been compromised.

But what does that number represent? In January of this year, two of Metro Presort’s clients had disclosed the number of their patients who had been impacted: Salem Clinic reported 20,908 patients were affected, and Oregon Heart Center reported 3,172 patients were impacted. Did Metro Presort’s report to HHS include those approximately 24,000 patients, or is their reported number in addition to them? At the time of the Ryuk ransomware incident, Metro Presort was reportedly providing business associate mailing services to 21 healthcare organizations.

DataBreaches.net sent an inquiry to Metro Presort asking for clarification on the number reported to HHS, i.e., whether it was all inclusive, but has received no reply by the time of this publication. This post will be updated when a reply is received.

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHIPAAMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← MI: Troy School District website down after hacking from outside U.S., leaders say
The Metropolitan Area of ​​Barcelona hit by ransomware →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked
  • UK: Legal Aid Agency hit by cyber security incident
  • Public notice for individuals affected by an information security breach in the Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division of Helsinki
  • PowerSchool paid a hacker’s extortion demand, but now school district clients are being extorted anyway (3)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed
  • Apple Siri Eavesdropping Payout Deadline Confirmed—How To Make A Claim
  • Privacy matters to Canadians – Privacy Commissioner of Canada marks Privacy Awareness Week with release of latest survey results

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.