DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

TX: Sewell Family of Companies discloses breach

Posted on March 23, 2021 by Dissent

Seen on their web site:

The Sewell Family of Companies has concluded an investigation into a data security incident that occurred August 1, 2020, when officials learned of an unauthorized attempt to access its network. At the time, SFC followed its protocol and immediately shut down its network to prevent further harm. SFC launched an investigation, notified the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and engaged computer forensic specialists to assist its internal team on this effort.

Although SFC found no evidence that information stored on its network has been misused, it is possible that the personal information of a portion of its community could have been exposed to individuals not authorized to view it.

This investigation was meticulous and today, March 17th, 2021,  was the soonest SFC was in position to provide the facts and ensure resources were in place to protect members of its community.

The Sewell Family of Companies mailed letters on March 17 to a small number of its customers, employees, and others who may have done business with SFC, and offered these individuals at least 12 months of credit monitoring services.

The vast majority of SFC employees and customers are not impacted, though we appreciate this is of little solace to those who do receive a letter. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

There is no evidence that fraud has occurred as a result of this incident. That said, employees and customers are encouraged to utilize these services to protect against fraudulent use of their personal information and remain vigilant against incidents of identity theft and fraud.
Sewell has established a call center to answer questions for those who receive letters. The number is (833) 416-0855.

Additionally, SFC has implemented a series of containment and remediation measures to address the incident, as well as strategies to defend the security of its network.

We are confident we are stronger and better following this experience.

So what kinds of data were involved? The notice doesn’t seem to explain that. And why couldn’t their investigation and work have been completed much sooner? Were there millions of email accounts to go through? What took so long? Why so long from incident to notification? 

 


Related:

  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • Data BreachesProsper Data Breach Impacts 17.6 Million Accounts
  • Gov't seeks police probe of KT for allegedly obstructing data breach investigation
Category: Business Sector

Post navigation

← NJ law firm provides notice of breach
Japan Halts Use Of Line App For Government Officials Over Chinese Data Breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.